Literature DB >> 15615799

Survival after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does left ventricular mass regression have a clinical correlate?

Mario Gaudino1, Francesco Alessandrini, Franco Glieca, Nicola Luciani, Carlo Cellini, Claudio Pragliola, Mauro Morelli, Carlo Canosa, Giuseppe Nasso, Gianfederico Possati.   

Abstract

AIM: The effects of post-operative left ventricular mass regression (LVMR) on clinical outcome after aortic valve surgery remains to be established. This study was intended to establish the impact of patient characteristics on post-operative survival in patients referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR), with particular regard to LVMR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty consecutive cases submitted to aortic valve replacement for valvular stenosis were prospectively followed for a mean of 28+/-9 months. Baseline, characteristics and extent of LVMR were tested for association with survival by uni- and multivariable analysis. Ten deaths occurred during hospital stay and 52 during out-of-hospital follow-up. Mean left ventricular mass decreased from 190+/-43 to 158+/-70 g/m2 (P<0.001). Older age, advanced functional class, hypertension, reduced left ventricle ejection fraction, and high pre-operative left ventricular mass index were associated with reduced survival. Overall the extent of LVMR did not influence the clinical results, while only early (<6 months) LVMR was weakly associated with mid-term outcome.
CONCLUSION: Survival after aortic valve surgery is mainly determined by the pre-operative functional cardiac and systemic status. The extent of LVMR does not correlate with clinical outcome, whereas aggressive treatment of hypertension may improve post-operative survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15615799     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  11 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  A case of critical aortic stenosis masquerading as acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Siddharth A Wayangankar; Tarun W Dasari; Pedro M Lozano; Karen J Beckman
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; William J Stewart; Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Catherine M Otto; Ke Xu; Richard B Devereux; Neil J Weissman; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Wilson Y Szeto; Raj Makkar; D Craig Miller; Stamatios Lerakis; Samir Kapadia; Bruce Bowers; Kevin L Greason; Thomas C McAndrew; Yang Lei; Martin B Leon; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 4.  Aortic valve stenosis and arterial hypertension: a synopsis in 2013.

Authors:  Vasiliki Katsi; Maria Marketou; Manolis S Kallistratos; Thomas Makris; Athanasios J Manolis; Dimitris Tousoulis; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Panos Vardas; Ioannis Kallikazaros
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Giovanni Minardi; Carla Manzara; Vittorio Creazzo; Daniele Maselli; Giovanni Casali; Giovanni Pulignano; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 6.  Factors affecting left ventricular remodeling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. An overview.

Authors:  Emmanuel Villa; Giovanni Troise; Marco Cirillo; Federico Brunelli; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Zen Mhagna; Giordano Tasca; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Christoph Auf der Maur; Xavier Mueller; Reinhard Schläpfer; Peiman Jamshidi; François Daubeuf; Nelly Frossard
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Timothy A Fairbairn; Christopher D Steadman; Adam N Mather; Manish Motwani; Daniel J Blackman; Sven Plein; Gerry P McCann; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Concentric Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis and Its Regression after Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Jang; Jeong-Sook Seo; Byung Joo Sun; Dae-Hee Kim; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-09-26

10.  The Influence of Aortic Valve Replacement on Functional Moderate - To-Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Sejla Sehovic; Adnana Talic; Mirsad Kacila; Elnur Tahirovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.