Literature DB >> 15614993

Validity of the prosthetic activity monitor to assess the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of prosthetic walking.

Johannes B J Bussmann1, Karen M Culhane, Herwin L D Horemans, Gerard M Lyons, Henk J Stam.   

Abstract

The prosthetic activity monitor (PAM) is an instrument to assess over the long-term the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of walking of amputees, during normal daily life. In this study, the validity of PAM-derived measurements was investigated. Twelve transtibial amputees performed an activity protocol, consisting of stationary and walking activities, and activities associated with nonlocomotor movements. The protocol also included potential sources of error and activities assumed to be prone to misdetection. Measurements consisted of the PAM and video recordings. Agreement between video analysis and PAM output was the main outcome measure. The PAM generally correctly classified stationary activities (100% inactive, 0% active, 0% locomotion), nonlocomotor activities (45% inactive, 55% active, 0% locomotion) and walking activities (0% inactive, 1.8% active, 98.2% locomotion). When walking, the number of strides taken was slightly underestimated (-1.0%). The underestimation of distance travelled (-6.2%) and walking speed (-5.8%) was greater. The agreement with video output decreased when the PAM was misaligned, when persons walked at a speed below the defined minimum speed, and when persons walked with crutches. The PAM provides valid data on activity classes and number of strides. Although the majority of the distance data was satisfactory, in some cases considerable differences were found between the PAM and the video data. The impact of alignment, walking speed, and use of assistive devices on the PAM's operation should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15614993     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.840495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  3 in total

1.  Classifying prosthetic use via accelerometry in persons with transtibial amputations.

Authors:  Morgan T Redfield; John C Cagle; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

2.  Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study.

Authors:  Salih A Salih; Nancye M Peel; Kara Burgess
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  A functional approach towards the design, development, and test of an affordable dynamic prosthetic foot.

Authors:  Mathieu Falbriard; Grégory Huot; Mathieu Janier; Rajasundar Chandran; Michael Rechsteiner; Véronique Michaud; Joël Cugnoni; John Botsis; Klaus Schönenberger; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.