Pamina M Gorbach1, Lydia N Drumright, King K Holmes. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Box 951772, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 900095-1772, USA. pgorbach@ucla.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Partnerships that are discordant by demographic and behavioral characteristics or are concurrent may facilitate transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by bridging sexual networks. GOAL: : The goal of this study was to examine if STI risk within partnerships is associated with discordance and concurrency using the partnership as the unit of analysis. STUDY: One hundred ninety-two individuals, in 96 new partnerships, recruited from sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, underwent a computer-assisted interview; were tested for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas; and their medical records were reviewed. Partnership variables for discordance by ethnicity, education level, number of lifetime partners, and relationship commitment, as well as concurrency and consistent condom use were tested for associations with partnership STI by chi-squared analysis and logistic regression. Associations between individual level STI, individual characteristics, relationship commitment, and concurrency were tested in bivariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: STI was detected in 22% of partnerships; discordance for demographics or relationship commitment was reported in 40% to 50%; and partner concurrency in 26%. Few partnerships (18%) reported consistent condom use in the prior month. In multivariate analyses, partnership-level STI was associated with discordance by ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; P = 0.04), commitment (OR, 4.2; P = 0.02), number of lifetime partners (OR, 4.9; P = 0.01), and concurrency (OR, 3.8; P = 0.03). Individual-level STI was associated with the individual's concurrency and Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance and concurrency are associated with STI at the partnership level and may reflect bridging between high- and low-risk STI networks. Partnership factors allowed additional assessment of STI risk over individual factors, suggesting that data on partnerships may identify individuals linked to risky networks.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Partnerships that are discordant by demographic and behavioral characteristics or are concurrent may facilitate transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by bridging sexual networks. GOAL: : The goal of this study was to examine if STI risk within partnerships is associated with discordance and concurrency using the partnership as the unit of analysis. STUDY: One hundred ninety-two individuals, in 96 new partnerships, recruited from sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, underwent a computer-assisted interview; were tested for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas; and their medical records were reviewed. Partnership variables for discordance by ethnicity, education level, number of lifetime partners, and relationship commitment, as well as concurrency and consistent condom use were tested for associations with partnership STI by chi-squared analysis and logistic regression. Associations between individual level STI, individual characteristics, relationship commitment, and concurrency were tested in bivariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: STI was detected in 22% of partnerships; discordance for demographics or relationship commitment was reported in 40% to 50%; and partner concurrency in 26%. Few partnerships (18%) reported consistent condom use in the prior month. In multivariate analyses, partnership-level STI was associated with discordance by ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; P = 0.04), commitment (OR, 4.2; P = 0.02), number of lifetime partners (OR, 4.9; P = 0.01), and concurrency (OR, 3.8; P = 0.03). Individual-level STI was associated with the individual's concurrency and Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance and concurrency are associated with STI at the partnership level and may reflect bridging between high- and low-risk STI networks. Partnership factors allowed additional assessment of STI risk over individual factors, suggesting that data on partnerships may identify individuals linked to risky networks.
Authors: Jose Castillo-Mancilla; Amanda Allshouse; Caitilin Collins; Marie Hastings-Tolsma; Thomas B Campbell; Samantha Mawhinney Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2012-02
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Eboni M Taylor; Maria R Khan; Robert J Schwartz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Emily B Hancock; Lisa E Manhart; Sara J Nelson; Roxanne Kerani; Jennifer K H Wroblewski; Patricia A Totten Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine G Sutcliffe; Apinun Aramrattana; Susan G Sherman; Bangorn Sirirojn; Danielle German; Kanlaya Wongworapat; Vu Minh Quan; Rassamee Keawvichit; David D Celentano Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Françoise Dubois-Arber; Giovanna Meystre-Agustoni; Jeannin André; Kim De Heller; Pécoud Alain; Patrick Bodenmann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pamina M Gorbach; Ryan Murphy; Robert E Weiss; Christopher Hucks-Ortiz; Steven Shoptaw Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 3.671