Literature DB >> 15612897

Using a standardised patient assessment to measure professional attributes.

Marta van Zanten1, John R Boulet, John J Norcini, Danette McKinley.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Professionalism is an important topic in medical education today. While much work has focused on defining professionalism and teaching medical students the appropriate interpersonal behaviours, relatively little research has looked at meaningful ways of assessing the relevant attributes.
METHOD: The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) clinical skills assessment (CSA) uses standardised patients (SPs) to evaluate the readiness of graduates of international medical schools to enter accredited graduate training programmes in the USA. Doctor interpersonal skills, including professional qualities such as rapport, are evaluated as part of the CSA. Attentiveness, attitude and empathy, all facets of professional behaviour, are specifically targeted as part of the assessment.
RESULTS: To date, over 35 000 candidates have been assessed, encompassing more than 370 000 individual SP encounters. Based on a 1-year cohort of examinees, the reliability of the individual professionalism-related component scores ranged from 0.61 to 0.70. Doctors who had graduated from medical school more recently, or were younger, generally obtained higher ratings. Professional qualities were only marginally related to measures of basic science and clinical science proficiency. Female candidates were rated significantly higher than male candidates on all dimensions.
CONCLUSIONS: While some professional behaviours are probably best measured using formats such as surveys, self-assessment and critical incident techniques, certain aspects of the domain can be reliably and validly measured in SP examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15612897     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

1.  Residents' perspectives on professionalism.

Authors:  Lewis P Krain; Ellen Lavelle
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

2.  ACGME core competencies: helpful information for psychologists.

Authors:  Barbara A Cubic; Edwin E Gatewood
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2008-03-14

3.  Does gender moderate medical students' assessments of unprofessional behavior?

Authors:  Terry D Stratton; Rosemarie L Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  The Desired Concept Maps and Goal Setting for Assessing Professionalism in Medicine.

Authors:  Salman Y Guraya; Shaista S Guraya; Nehal Anam Mahabbat; Khulood Yahya Fallatah; Bashaer Ahmad Al-Ahmadi; Hadeel Hadi Alalawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

5.  Differences in Faculty and Standardized Patient Scores on Professionalism for Second-Year Podiatric Medical Students During a Standardized Simulated Patient Encounter.

Authors:  James M Mahoney; Vassilios Vardaxis; Noreen Anwar; Jacob Hagenbucher
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2018-03

Review 6.  Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties.

Authors:  Honghe Li; Ning Ding; Yuanyuan Zhang; Yang Liu; Deliang Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The influence of personal and environmental factors on professionalism in medical education.

Authors:  Colin P West; Tait D Shanafelt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine.

Authors:  Joanne M Hemmerdinger; Samuel D R Stoddart; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Nursing professionalism: An evolutionary concept analysis.

Authors:  Fataneh Ghadirian; Mahvash Salsali; Mohammad Ali Cheraghi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.