Literature DB >> 15612698

Hydrogen bonds of RNA are stronger than those of DNA, but NMR monitors only presence of methyl substituent in uracil/thymine.

Marcel Swart1, Célia Fonseca Guerra, F Matthias Bickelhaupt.   

Abstract

Recently, Vakonakis and LiWang (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5688) reported experimental evidence for stronger hydrogen bonds in RNA A:U than in DNA A:T base pairs, which was based on differences in NMR shielding for adenine C2. We have analyzed the proposed correlation between NMR shielding and hydrogen-bond strength using density functional theory. Although we agree with the conclusion that A:U is more strongly bound, we find no correlation between the hydrogen-bond strength and the NMR shielding of C2. Our study shows that NMR merely probes the presence/absence of the methyl group in thymine/uracil, without any relation to the strength of the hydrogen bonds involved. In other words, one cannot infer the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bond strength from the NMR shielding constant of adenine C2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15612698     DOI: 10.1021/ja045276b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  15 in total

1.  Quantum chemical studies of nucleic acids: can we construct a bridge to the RNA structural biology and bioinformatics communities?

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Judit E Šponer; Anton I Petrov; Neocles B Leontis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  How Does Mg2+ Modulate the RNA Folding Mechanism: A Case Study of the G:C W:W Trans Basepair.

Authors:  Antarip Halder; Rohit Roy; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Abhijit Mitra
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  N-H stretching excitations in adenosine-thymidine base pairs in solution: pair geometries, infrared line shapes, and ultrafast vibrational dynamics.

Authors:  Christian Greve; Nicholas K Preketes; Henk Fidder; Rene Costard; Benjamin Koeppe; Ismael A Heisler; Shaul Mukamel; Friedrich Temps; Erik T J Nibbering; Thomas Elsaesser
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Computational and empirical trans-hydrogen bond deuterium isotope shifts suggest that N1-N3 A:U hydrogen bonds of RNA are shorter than those of A:T hydrogen bonds of DNA.

Authors:  Yong-Ick Kim; Marlon N Manalo; Lisa M Peréz; Andy LiWang
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  2'-Fluoro RNA shows increased Watson-Crick H-bonding strength and stacking relative to RNA: evidence from NMR and thermodynamic data.

Authors:  Amritraj Patra; Michael Paolillo; Klaus Charisse; Muthiah Manoharan; Eriks Rozners; Martin Egli
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Mg2+ binding and archaeosine modification stabilize the G15 C48 Levitt base pair in tRNAs.

Authors:  Romina Oliva; Anna Tramontano; Luigi Cavallo
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Unexpected origins of the enhanced pairing affinity of 2'-fluoro-modified RNA.

Authors:  Pradeep S Pallan; Emily M Greene; Paul Andrei Jicman; Rajendra K Pandey; Muthiah Manoharan; Eriks Rozners; Martin Egli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Mesoscopic model parametrization of hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions of RNA from melting temperatures.

Authors:  Gerald Weber
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Accurate energies of hydrogen bonded nucleic acid base pairs and triplets in tRNA tertiary interactions.

Authors:  Romina Oliva; Luigi Cavallo; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  B-DNA Structure and Stability as Function of Nucleic Acid Composition: Dispersion-Corrected DFT Study of Dinucleoside Monophosphate Single and Double Strands.

Authors:  Giampaolo Barone; Célia Fonseca Guerra; F Matthias Bickelhaupt
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.