Literature DB >> 15611371

Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index.

Bart-Jan Verhoeff1, Maria Siebes, Martijn Meuwissen, Bektas Atasever, Michiel Voskuil, Robbert J de Winter, Karel T Koch, Jan G P Tijssen, Jos A E Spaan, Jan J Piek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular resistance during maximal hyperemia is generally assumed to be unaffected by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We assessed a velocity-based index of hyperemic microvascular resistance (h-MR(v)) by using prototypes of a novel, dual-sensor (Doppler velocity and pressure)-equipped guidewire before and after PCI to test this hypothesis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Aortic pressure, flow velocity (h-v), and pressure (h-P(d)) distal to 24 coronary lesions were measured simultaneously during maximal hyperemia induced by intracoronary adenosine. Measurements were obtained in the reference vessel before PCI and in the target vessel before and after PCI, stenting, and ultrasound-guided, upsized stenting. h-P(d) increased from 57.9+/-17.0 to 85.5+/-15.6 mm Hg, and h-MR(v) (ie, h-P(d)/h-v) decreased from 2.74+/-1.40 to 1.58+/-0.61 mm Hg x cm(-1) . s after stenting (both P<0.001). The reduction in h-MR(v) accounted for 34% of the decrease in total coronary resistance achieved by PCI. h-MR(v) of the target vessel after PCI was lower than that of the corresponding reference vessel despite a higher h-P(d) in the reference vessel (P<0.01). Post-PCI baseline MR(v) was correlated with baseline P(d) before PCI (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: PCI-induced restoration of P(d) resulted in a reduction of h-MR(v) in accordance with the pressure dependence of h-MR(v). The decrease in h-MR(v) to a level below that of the corresponding reference vessel in the immediate post-PCI period and a lowered baseline MR(v) suggest microvascular remodeling induced by long-term exposure to a low-pressure environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611371     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151610.98409.2F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  34 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Wall thickness of coronary vessels varies transmurally in the LV but not the RV: implications for local stress distribution.

Authors:  Jenny Susana Choy; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Effect of myocardial contractility on hemodynamic end points under concomitant microvascular disease in a porcine model.

Authors:  Srikara Viswanath Peelukhana; Kranthi K Kolli; Massoud A Leesar; Mohamed A Effat; Tarek A Helmy; Imran Arif; Eric W Schneeberger; Paul Succop; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn A van Lavieren; José P S Henriques; Jan J Piek; Bimmer E P M Claessen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

5.  Persistent kidney dysfunction in swine renal artery stenosis correlates with outer cortical microvascular remodeling.

Authors:  Alfonso Eirin; Xiang-Yang Zhu; Victor H Urbieta-Caceres; Joseph P Grande; Amir Lerman; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2011-03-02

6.  An angiographic technique for coronary fractional flow reserve measurement: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Shigeho Takarada; Zhang Zhang; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Christina Kolyva; Bart-Jan Verhoeff; Jan J Piek; Jos A Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Myocardial perfusion distribution and coronary arterial pressure and flow signals: clinical relevance in relation to multiscale modeling, a review.

Authors:  Froukje Nolte; Eoin R Hyde; Cristina Rolandi; Jack Lee; Pepijn van Horssen; Kal Asrress; Jeroen P H M van den Wijngaard; Andrew N Cookson; Tim van de Hoef; Radomir Chabiniok; Reza Razavi; Christian Michler; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Jan J Piek; Marcel Breeuwer; Maria Siebes; Eike Nagel; Nic P Smith; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve using single photon emission computed tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tracers.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Andrea Soricelli; Giovanni Storto; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Paolo G Camici; Koen M Marques; Robin Nijveldt; Jeroen J Bax; Nico Westerhof; Marco J W Götte; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Heinrich R Schelbert; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 17.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.