Literature DB >> 15611207

"Grab" and good science: writing up the results of qualitative research.

Jane F Gilgun1.   

Abstract

Qualitative researchers have an array of choices in how to write up their research. Yet many write in distanced, third-person voices and give short shrift to the voices of informants, as if neither they nor their informants were part of the research. In doing so, they might believe that their writing style is scientific. Unfortunately, such styles of writing not only silence their informants and themselves, but many times they also contradict the philosophies of science on which many forms of qualitative research are based. If our philosophies of science are science, then how we write up our research, when it is consistent with our science, must logically be scientific. "Grab," or writing that is both interesting and memorable, goes hand in hand with good science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15611207     DOI: 10.1177/1049732304268796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  3 in total

1. 

Authors:  Judy King; Lucie Brosseau; Paulette Guitard; Chantal Laroche; Julie Alexandra Barette; Dominique Cardinal; Sabrina Cavallo; Lucie Laferrière; Karine Toupin-April; Marie-Ève Bérubé; Jennifer O'Neil; Jessane Castro; Cendy Kidjo; Sandy Fakhry; Ann Sutton; Roseline Galipeau; Jocelyne Tourigny; Josée Lagacé; Catrine Demers; Nicole Paquet; Denyse Pharand; Laurianne Loew; Véronique Vaillancourt; Katrine Sauvé-Schenk
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.

Authors:  Teresa A O'Sullivan; Curtis G Jefferson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Tobacco document research reporting.

Authors:  S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.552

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.