Literature DB >> 1561048

Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise.

K R Kluender1, R L Jenison.   

Abstract

Listeners are quite adept at maintaining integrated perceptual events in environments that are frequently noisy. Three experiments were conducted to assess the mechanisms by which listeners maintain continuity for upward sinusoidal glides that are interrupted by a period of broadband noise. The first two experiments used stimulus complexes consisting of three parts: prenoise glide, broadband noise interval, and postnoise glide. For a given prenoise glide and noise interval, the subject's task was to adjust the onset frequency of a same-slope postnoise glide so that, together with the prenoise glide and noise, the complex sounded as "smooth and continuous as possible." The slope of the glides (1.67, 3.33, 5, and 6.67 Bark/sec) as well as the duration (50, 200, and 350 msec) and relative level of the interrupting noise (0, -6, and -12 dB S/N) were varied. For all but the shallowest glides, subjects consistently adjusted the offset portion of the glide to frequencies lower than predicted by accurate interpolation of the prenoise portion. Curiously, for the shallowest glides, subjects consistently selected postnoise glide onset-frequency values higher than predicted by accurate extrapolation of the prenoise glide. There was no effect of noise level on subjects' adjustments in the first two experiments. The third experiment used a signal detection task to measure the phenomenal experience of continuity through the noise. Frequency glides were either present or absent during the noise for stimuli like those use in the first two experiments as well as for stimuli that had no prenoise or postnoise glides. Subjects were more likely to report the presence of glides in the noise when none occurred (false positives) when noise was shorter or of greater relative level and when glides were present adjacent to the noise.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561048     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Musicalillusions.

Authors:  D Deutsch
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions.

Authors:  G L Dannenbring
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1976-06

3.  Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise.

Authors:  V Ciocca; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-11

4.  Auditory induction: perceptual synthesis of absent sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; C J Obusek; J M Ackroff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Space is to time as vision is to audition: seductive but misleading.

Authors:  S Handel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Auditory streaming is cumulative.

Authors:  A S Bregman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Capturing frequency components of glided tones: frequency separation, orientation, and alignment.

Authors:  H Steiger; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-11
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Encoding of illusory continuity in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

Review 5.  Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan; Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Global not local masker features govern the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Illusory auditory continuity despite neural evidence to the contrary.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Dynamic cortical representations of perceptual filling-in for missing acoustic rhythm.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Illusory sound texture reveals multi-second statistical completion in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Richard McWalter; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.