Literature DB >> 15609239

Protective immunization against inhalational anthrax: a comparison of minimally invasive delivery platforms.

John A Mikszta1, Vincent J Sullivan, Cheryl Dean, Andrea M Waterston, Jason B Alarcon, John P Dekker, John M Brittingham, Juan Huang, C Robin Hwang, Matthew Ferriter, Ge Jiang, Kevin Mar, Kamal U Saikh, Bradley G Stiles, Chad J Roy, Robert G Ulrich, Noel G Harvey.   

Abstract

A new anthrax vaccine under clinical investigation is based on recombinant Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (rPA). Here, we investigated microneedle-based cutaneous and nasal mucosal delivery of rPA in mice and rabbits. In mice, intradermal (id) delivery achieved up to 90% seroconversion after a single dose, compared with 20% after intramuscular (im) injection. Intranasal (inl) delivery of a liquid formulation required 3 doses to achieve responses that were comparable with those achieved via the id or im routes. In rabbits, id delivery provided complete protection against aerosol challenge with anthrax spores; in addition, novel powder formulations administered inl provided complete protection, whereas a liquid formulation provided only partial protection. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that cutaneous or nasal mucosal administration of rPA provides complete protection against inhalational anthrax in rabbits. The novel vaccine/device combinations described here have the potential to improve the efficacy of rPA and other biodefense vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15609239     DOI: 10.1086/426865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  47 in total

1.  Effective induction of protective systemic immunity with nasally administered vaccines adjuvanted with IL-1.

Authors:  William M Gwinn; Shaun M Kirwan; Sheena H Wang; Kathleen A Ashcraft; Neil L Sparks; Catherine R Doil; Tom G Tlusty; Leslie S Casey; Susan K Hollingshead; David E Briles; Richard S Dondero; Anthony J Hickey; W Michael Foster; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Microinfusion using hollow microneedles.

Authors:  Wijaya Martanto; Jason S Moore; Osama Kashlan; Rachna Kamath; Ping M Wang; Jessica M O'Neal; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Coated microneedles for transdermal delivery.

Authors:  Harvinder S Gill; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Successful respiratory immunization with dry powder live-attenuated measles virus vaccine in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Wen-Hsuan Lin; Diane E Griffin; Paul A Rota; Mark Papania; Stephen P Cape; David Bennett; Brian Quinn; Robert E Sievers; Charles Shermer; Kenneth Powell; Robert J Adams; Steven Godin; Scott Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Needle-free skin patch delivery of a vaccine for a potentially pandemic influenza virus provides protection against lethal challenge in mice.

Authors:  Sanjay Garg; Mary Hoelscher; Jessica A Belser; Chong Wang; Lakshmi Jayashankar; Zhu Guo; Ross H Durland; Jacqueline M Katz; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-05-09

6.  Evaluation of combinatorial vaccines against anthrax and plague in a murine model.

Authors:  Amanda B DuBois; Lucy C Freytag; John D Clements
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Correlation between lethal toxin-neutralizing antibody titers and protection from intranasal challenge with Bacillus anthracis Ames strain spores in mice after transcutaneous immunization with recombinant anthrax protective antigen.

Authors:  Kristina K Peachman; Mangala Rao; Carl R Alving; Robert Burge; Stephen H Leppla; Venigalla B Rao; Gary R Matyas
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Anubhav Arora; Mark R Prausnitz; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

9.  Microneedle-based intradermal delivery enables rapid lymphatic uptake and distribution of protein drugs.

Authors:  Alfred J Harvey; Scott A Kaestner; Diane E Sutter; Noel G Harvey; John A Mikszta; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Does needle size matter?

Authors:  Harvinder S Gill; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.