Literature DB >> 15608676

A novel mechanism of checkpoint abrogation conferred by Chk1 downregulation.

Zhan Xiao1, John Xue, Thomas J Sowin, Saul H Rosenberg, Haiying Zhang.   

Abstract

Chk1 is the major mediator in the activation of cell-cycle checkpoints in response to a variety of genotoxic stresses. We have previously shown that inhibition of Chk1 sensitizes tumor cells to topoisomerase inhibitors such as camptothecin and doxorubicin through abrogation of cell-cycle arrest (S or G2/M checkpoints). However, it was not clear whether inhibition of Chk1 could potentiate antimetabolites, a mainstay of cancer therapy, which confer genotoxic stress through a different mechanism than topoisomerase inhibitors. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most widely used antimetabolite in the treatment of colorectal, breast and other major types of cancers. Here we demonstrate that 5-FU activates Chk1 and induces an early S-phase arrest. Chk1 downregulation abrogates this arrest and dramatically sensitizes tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU. 5-FU confers S-phase arrest through Chk1-mediated Cdc25A proteolysis leading to inhibition of Cdk2. Chk1 elimination stabilizes the Cdc25A protein and results in the abrogation of the S checkpoint and resumption of DNA synthesis, which leads to excessive accumulation of double-stranded DNA breaks. As a result, downregulation of Chk1 potentiates 5-FU efficacy through induction of premature chromosomal condensation followed by apoptosis. Interestingly, the profiles of various cell-cycle markers indicate that cells progress to early M phase to induce apoptosis after checkpoint abrogation. Yet, cells fail to increase their DNA content to 4N as revealed by FACS analysis, probably due to the dramatic induction of double-stranded DNA breaks and chromosomal fragmentation. This is significantly different from the cell-cycle profiles observed in the potentiation of topoisomerase inhibitors by Chk1 siRNA, which showed mitotic progression with 4N DNA content leading to mitotic catastrophe after abrogation of the S or G2 checkpoint. Thus, our results illustrate a novel mode of checkpoint abrogation and cell death conferred by Chk1 inhibition. Additionally, we show that Chk1 deficiency potentiates 5-FU efficacy through the preferential induction of the caspase-8 pathway and subsequent caspase-3 activation. In conclusion, we have clearly demonstrated that inhibition of Chk1 not only potentiates the toxicity of conventional DNA-damaging agents such as ionizing radiation and topoisomerase inhibitors, but also enhances the toxicity of antimetabolites in cancer cell lines. This discovery reveals novel scope of checkpoint abrogation and will significantly broaden the potential application of Chk1 inhibitors in cancer therapy if they do not potentiate the toxicity of 5-FU in normal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15608676     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  35 in total

1.  Chk1 and p21 cooperate to prevent apoptosis during DNA replication fork stress.

Authors:  Rene Rodriguez; Mark Meuth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage.

Authors:  Yves Pommier; Juana M Barcelo; V Ashutosh Rao; Olivier Sordet; Andrew G Jobson; Laurent Thibaut; Ze-Hong Miao; Jennifer A Seiler; Hongliang Zhang; Christophe Marchand; Keli Agama; John L Nitiss; Christophe Redon
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  2006

3.  Cdc7-Dbf4 and the human S checkpoint response to UVC.

Authors:  Timothy P Heffernan; Keziban Unsal-Kaçmaz; Alexandra N Heinloth; Dennis A Simpson; Richard S Paules; Aziz Sancar; Marila Cordeiro-Stone; William K Kaufmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  A novel Chk inhibitor, XL-844, increases human cancer cell radiosensitivity through promotion of mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Oliver Riesterer; Fumihiko Matsumoto; Li Wang; Jessica Pickett; David Molkentine; Uma Giri; Luka Milas; Uma Raju
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment.

Authors:  S Solier; Y-W Zhang; A Ballestrero; Y Pommier; G Zoppoli
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.428

6.  The MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 mediates gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Frederik Köpper; Anna Maria Binkowski; Cathrin Bierwirth; Matthias Dobbelstein
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Predictive markers for the response to 5-fluorouracil therapy in cancer cells: Constant-field gel electrophoresis as a tool for prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  E M Saleh; R A El-Awady; N Anis
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  SMUG1 but not UNG DNA glycosylase contributes to the cellular response to recovery from 5-fluorouracil induced replication stress.

Authors:  Pratik Nagaria; David Svilar; Ashley R Brown; Xiao-Hong Wang; Robert W Sobol; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  HMGA2 inhibits apoptosis through interaction with ATR-CHK1 signaling complex in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Suchitra Natarajan; Sabine Hombach-Klonisch; Peter Dröge; Thomas Klonisch
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Enhanced H2AX phosphorylation, DNA replication fork arrest, and cell death in the absence of Chk1.

Authors:  Mary E Gagou; Pedro Zuazua-Villar; Mark Meuth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.