Literature DB >> 15608031

Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH: a pilot study.

M J Pelinck1, N E A Vogel, A Hoek, E G J M Arts, A H M Simons, M J Heineman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of the natural cycle for IVF offers the advantage of a patient-friendly and low-risk protocol. Its effectiveness is limited, but may be improved by using a GnRH antagonist to prevent untimely LH surges.
METHODS: In this pilot study, minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and simultaneous substitution with recombinant FSH was applied for a maximum of three cycles per patient. Main outcome measures were pregnancy rates per started cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles.
RESULTS: A total of 50 patients completed 119 cycles (2.4 per patient). Fifty-two embryo transfers resulted in 17 ongoing pregnancies [14.3% per started cycle; 32.7% per embryo transfer; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9-20.7% and 19.7-45.7%, respectively]. One dizygotic twin pregnancy occurred after transfer of two embryos, the other pregnancies were singletons. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three cycles was 34% (95% CI 20.6-47.4%). Live birth rate was 32% per patient (95% CI 18.8-45.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates after IVF with minimal, late follicular phase stimulation are encouraging. Considering the low-risk and patient-friendly nature of this protocol, it may be a feasible alternative to IVF with ovarian hyperstimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15608031     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  The decrease of serum luteinizing hormone level by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist following the mild IVF stimulation protocol for IVF and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  Atsushi Yanaihara; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Hiroshi Motoyama; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.

Authors:  Alexandra J Bensdorp; Els Slappendel; Carolien Koks; Jur Oosterhuis; Annemieke Hoek; Peter Hompes; Frank Broekmans; Harold Verhoeve; Jan Peter de Bruin; Janne Meije van Weert; Maaike Traas; Jacques Maas; Nicole Beckers; Sjoerd Repping; Ben W Mol; Fulco van der Veen; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response.

Authors:  Lucky Sekhon; Kathryn Shaia; Anthony Santistevan; Karen Hunter Cohn; Joseph A Lee; Piraye Yurttas Beim; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Natural cycle IVF/IVM may be more desirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles.

Authors:  Jianhua Li; Ye Xu; Guoping Zhou; Junhong Guo; Nan Xin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Affordable ART for developing countries: a cost benefit comparison of low dose stimulation versus high dose GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  M Noorashikin; F B Ong; M H Omar; M R Zainul-Rashid; A Z Murad; A Shamsir; M A Norsina; A Nurshaireen; N S M N Sharifah-Teh; A H Fazilah
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Mild stimulation with clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and its influence on serum estradiol level and pregnancy rate.

Authors:  Atsushi Yanaihara; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Hiroshi Motoyama; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17

7.  Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

Authors:  Ji Hee Yoo; Sun Hwa Cha; Chan Woo Park; Jin Young Kim; Kwang Moon Yang; In Ok Song; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang; Hye Ok Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 8.  Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Review.

Authors:  Vinayak Smith; Tiki Osianlis; Beverley Vollenhoven
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2015-05-14

9.  Live Birth after Rescue In vitro Maturation-intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Type 1 Diabetes, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patient Using Clomiphene-antagonist Protocol.

Authors:  Samundi Sankari; M Elanchezhian; Divya Selvamani; M Nagarajan; D Gopikrishnan
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.