Literature DB >> 18654847

Affordable ART for developing countries: a cost benefit comparison of low dose stimulation versus high dose GnRH antagonist protocol.

M Noorashikin1, F B Ong, M H Omar, M R Zainul-Rashid, A Z Murad, A Shamsir, M A Norsina, A Nurshaireen, N S M N Sharifah-Teh, A H Fazilah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low dose stimulation (LS) is emerging as an alternative regime in assisted reproductive technology (ART). This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of LS to the high dose GnRH antagonist (Atg) regime.
METHODS: An observational prospective study conducted at an academic infertility unit from January to June 2007. Outcome measures included the numbers of follicles, oocytes and embryos, morphological quality of oocytes and embryos, clinical pregnancy (PR) and complication rate. RESULT: Ninety five first attempt ICSI cycles consisting of 54 LS and 41 Atg were analyzed. Subjects in both groups had comparable sociodemographics and reproductive characteristics. LS generated significantly fewer follicles, total oocytes, mature oocytes (all p < 0.0005) and immature oocytes (p = 0.009) than Atg but the number of excellent quality oocytes was similar. Significantly fewer embryos were available in LS although the proportion of usable embryos was higher, 83.2% vs. 67.0% for Atg. Mean embryos per transfer was 2.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 1.0 (p = 0.02) for a clinical PR per transfer of 43.2% vs. 50.0% for LS and Atg respectively. LS regime had a shorter gonadotrophin administration period with resultant COH cost one third of the Atg protocol (both, p < 0.0005). The cost per live birth per started cycle worked out to be USD 13,200 and 24,900 for LS and Atg respectively. Furthermore, LS had fewer incidences of OHSS compared to the Atg regime, 3.7% vs. 12.2%.
CONCLUSION: LS cost benefits included lower amounts of gonadotrophin used and fewer injections. It is a viable alternative regime in producing comparable clinical PR at lower cost and less complication in ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18654847      PMCID: PMC2596680          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9239-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Experience with the elective transfer of two embryos under the conditions of the german embryo protection law: results of a retrospective data analysis of 2573 transfer cycles.

Authors:  M Ludwig; B Schöpper; A Katalinic; R Sturm; S Al-Hasani; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks.

Authors:  B C Fauser; P Devroey; S S Yen; R Gosden; W F Crowley; D T Baird; P Bouchard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval.

Authors:  J Holte; L Berglund; K Milton; C Garello; G Gennarelli; A Revelli; T Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther B Baart; Elena Martini; Marinus J Eijkemans; Diane Van Opstal; Nicole G M Beckers; Arie Verhoeff; Nicolas S Macklon; Bart C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.

Authors:  S Polinder; E M E W Heijnen; N S Macklon; J D F Habbema; B J C M Fauser; M J C Eijkemans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Minimal ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization using sequential clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin with or without the addition of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.

Authors:  Shaun C Williams; William E Gibbons; Suheil J Muasher; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M J Pelinck; A Hoek; A H M Simons; M J Heineman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 8.  Affordable IVF for developing countries.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.

Authors:  Clazien A M Bouwmans; Bea M E Lintsen; Marinus J C Eijkemans; J Dik F Habbema; Didi D M Braat; Leona Hakkaart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David Barad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of polyvinylpyrrolidone on sperm function and early embryonic development following intracytoplasmic sperm injection in human assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Yoku Kato; Yoshikazu Nagao
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.