Literature DB >> 15607974

INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair.

Ashby J Morrison1, Jessica Highland, Nevan J Krogan, Ayelet Arbel-Eden, Jack F Greenblatt, James E Haber, Xuetong Shen.   

Abstract

While the role of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in transcription is well established, a link between chromatin remodeling and DNA repair has remained elusive. We have found that the evolutionarily conserved INO80 chromatin remodeling complex directly participates in the repair of a double-strand break (DSB) in yeast. The INO80 complex is recruited to a HO endonuclease-induced DSB through a specific interaction with the DNA damage-induced phosphorylated histone H2A (gamma-H2AX). This interaction requires Nhp10, an HMG-like subunit of the INO80 complex. The loss of Nhp10 or gamma-H2AX results in reduced INO80 recruitment to the DSB. Finally, components of the INO80 complex show synthetic genetic interactions with the RAD52 DNA repair pathway, the main pathway for DSB repair in yeast. Our findings reveal a new role of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in nuclear processes and suggest that an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex can read a DNA repair histone code.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15607974     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  248 in total

Review 1.  Histone-modifying enzymes, histone modifications and histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly: Lessons learned from Rtt109 histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; Xiaoyue Chen; Michael A Walters; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Tracey J Au; Jairo Rodriguez; Jack A Vincent; Toshio Tsukiyama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The dynamic interplay in chromatin remodeling factors polycomb and trithorax proteins in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Yongguang Tao; Xiang Chen; Ya Cao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  A peek into the complex realm of histone phosphorylation.

Authors:  Taraswi Banerjee; Debabrata Chakravarti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Initiation of DNA double strand break repair: signaling and single-stranded resection dictate the choice between homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and alternative end-joining.

Authors:  Anastazja Grabarz; Aurélia Barascu; Josée Guirouilh-Barbat; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  The INO80 ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex is a nucleosome spacing factor.

Authors:  Maheshi Udugama; Abdellah Sabri; Blaine Bartholomew
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Mi-2/NuRD complex making inroads into DNA-damage response pathway.

Authors:  Da-Qiang Li; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Haico van Attikum; Olivier Fritsch; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Comparative genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of four hexavalent chromium compounds in human bronchial cells.

Authors:  Sandra S Wise; Amie L Holmes; Qin Qin; Hong Xie; Spiros P Katsifis; W Douglas Thompson; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.