Literature DB >> 15605070

One hour versus two hours postprandial glucose measurement in gestational diabetes: a prospective study.

Boaz Weisz1, Alon Shrim, Carol J Homko, Eyal Schiff, Gil S Epstein, Eyal Sivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of adverse perinatal outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), monitored by 1 versus 2 hour-postprandial glucose (PPG) measurements.
METHODS: A total of 112 women diagnosed with GDM, by the criteria of Carpenter-Coustan, were included in the study population. Women were recruited from two different treatment settings, but were managed by the same team of health-care professionals using a standardized protocol. Allocation to treatment group was based on treatment setting. Glucose levels were measured fasting, and either 1 hour (1-hour monitoring group-target values <140 mg/dl) or 2 hours (2-hour monitoring group-target values <120 mg/dl) postprandially. Demographic data and perinatal outcomes were collected from their medical records.
RESULTS: In all, 66 women were assigned to 1-hour monitoring group (1 h-PPG) and 46 women to 2-hour monitoring group (2 h-PPG). There were no differences in parity, family history of diabetes, rate of GDM in previous pregnancies, weight gain, pregestational BMI and 50-g-glucose challenge test (GCT) and 100-g oral glucose challenge test (OGTT) results. As expected, there was a significant difference in mean blood glucose levels between the two groups (108.1+/-19.2 and 94.9+/-21.2 mg/dl, 1- and 2 hours, respectively, p<0.0001); however, HbA1C levels were similar in the two groups. Perinatal outcomes were defined as gestational week at delivery; fetal weight (3325+/-471 vs 3309+/-608 g, respectively) and percentile (47.2+/-27 vs 49.6+/-30, respectively), and were similar for both groups. Insulin therapy was initiated more frequently in 2-hour monitoring group (28 and 40% of women in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p<0.05). Rates of macrosomia (7.5 versus 10.6%), large for gestational age (7.4 versus 15.2%), and delivery by cesarean section (24 versus 30%) were increased in group 2 (2 h-PPG) but these differences did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that diet control in women with GDM managed by 1-hour PPG measurements is associated with a decreased rate of insulin therapy. However, neonatal and obstetrical outcomes are not determined by the timing of their glucose determinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15605070     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  8 in total

Review 1.  Glycemic targets in pregnancies affected by diabetes: historical perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy.

Authors:  Puvaneswary Raman; Emily Shepherd; Therese Dowswell; Philippa Middleton; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-29

Review 3.  Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Nisreen A Alwan; Jane West; Stephen Brown; Christopher Jd McKinlay; Diane Farrar; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 4.  Glucose Targets and Insulin Choice in Pregnancy: What Has Changed in the Last Decade?

Authors:  Siobhán Bacon; Denice S Feig
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Comparison of postprandial 90th-minute plasma glucose level with 60th- and 120th-minute levels in patients with gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ozge Sever; Kemal Sarsmaz; A S Ozgu-Erdinc; Aykan Yucel
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  One-hour versus two-hour postprandial blood glucose measurement in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: which is more predictive?

Authors:  A Seval Ozgu-Erdinc; Cantekin Iskender; Dilek Uygur; Aysegul Oksuzoglu; K Doga Seckin; M Ilkin Yeral; Zeynep I Kalaylioglu; Aykan Yucel; A Nuri Danisman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged?

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez; Jacob E Friedman; Rachael E Van Pelt; Linda A Barbour
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Expert Group Recommendations on the Effective Use of Bolus Insulin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Rajeev Chawla; Jagat Jyoti Mukherjee; Manoj Chawla; Alok Kanungo; Meenakshi Sundaram Shunmugavelu; Ashok Kumar Das
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.