Literature DB >> 15603471

The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.

Holly L Storkel1.   

Abstract

The effects of phonotactic constraints (i.e., the status of a sound as correctly or incorrectly articulated) and phonotactic probability (i.e., the likelihood of a sound sequence) on lexical acquisition have been investigated independently. This study investigated the interactive influence of phonotactic constraints and phonotactic probability on lexical acquisition in 3 groups of children: children with functional phonological delays (PD), phonology-matched, younger, typically developing children (PM), and age-/vocabulary-matched typically developing peers (AVM). Sixty-eight children participated in a multitrial word-learning task involving nonwords varying in phonotactic constraints (IN vs. OUT) and phonotactic probability (common vs. rare). Correct and error responses were analyzed. Results indicated that OUT sound sequences were learned more rapidly than IN sound sequences. This suggests that OUT sounds may be salient because they represent only a small subset of the child's sound system. The effect of phonotactic probability varied across groups: Children with PD showed a common sound sequence disadvantage, younger PM children showed a common sound sequence advantage, and AVM children showed no effect. Moreover, error analyses indicated that children with PD had particular difficulty creating lexical representations and associations between lexical and semantic representations when learning common sound sequences. Children with PD may rely more heavily on lexical representations to learn new words or may have difficulty learning common sound sequences because of the high degree of similarity between these sequences and other known words. Finally, the effect of phonotactic probability was consistent across IN and OUT sound sequences, suggesting that the lexical representation of both correctly articulated and misarticulated words is based on the adult-target pronunciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15603471     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/088)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  29 in total

1.  Evidence-based practice: a matrix for predicting phonological generalization.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut; Lauren E Hulse
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Megha Bahl; Rebecca Vance; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Junko Maekawa
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2005-11

5.  Do children still pick and choose? The relationship between phonological knowledge and lexical acquisition beyond 50 words.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Lexical competition in young children's word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Phonological complexity and language learnability.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Adult and child semantic neighbors of the Kroll and Potter (1984) nonobjects.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Suzanne M Adlof
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.