Literature DB >> 15602628

Are difficulties during transbronchial lung biopsy/brushing through a fiberoptic bronchoscope based on the bronchial anatomy?

Akira Sakurada1, Naoaki Takahashi, Masami Sato, Yoshihiro Miyagawa, Hirofumi Matsumura, Gen Murakami.   

Abstract

Some of the difficulties encountered during transbronchial lung biopsy through a flexible bronchofiberscope are due to anatomical reasons, namely the branching angles of some subsegmental bronchi from their mother bronchi are large, and differences in branching angles during respiration may also be large. This makes insertion of forceps difficult. We have sometimes experienced difficulties reaching the target lesion during a transbronchial approach. Which subsegmental bronchi make transbronchial lung biopsy/brushing difficult, and are such difficulties due to anatomical reasons? To answer these questions, we firstly surveyed 10 bronchologists regarding which five subsegmental bronchi they considered to be the most difficult for transbronchial biopsy/brushing. We then measured the branching angles of subsegmental bronchi in 106 cadaver lungs. Finally, in six volunteers, we also measured differences in branching angles of the subsegmental bronchi between the point of forced inspiration and the point of forced expiration on CT images. According to the survey, left B(1+2)c was considered to be the most difficult for insertion by nine doctors, followed by bilateral B6a by seven, right B1a by five, left B3a by five and left B(1+2)a by four. The results of our dissections showed that a branching angle of over 60 masculine was present in more than 10% of specimens in B3a, B6a and B6c in the right lung and in B(1+2)c, B3a, B6a and B6c in the left lung. In addition, three-dimensional reconstructed images revealed that the angles of some subsegmental bronchi changed during respiration. Inter-individual variations were present in most subsegmental bronchi. The direction of movement of each subsegmental bronchus during respiration varied. In addition, maximum degrees of difference in angles between volunteers were sometimes as much as 80 degrees . In conclusion, branching angles of subsegmental bronchi from their mother bronchi are large in B3a, B6a and B6c in the right lung and in B(1+2)c, B3a, B6a and B6c in the left lung. Most of these correspond to those which many bronchologists felt to be difficult for insertion. In addition, changes in the angles of subsegmental bronchi during respiration are likely to partially account for difficulties encountered during transbronchial approaches.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15602628     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-004-0297-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  Semi-automated tabulation of the 3D topology and morphology of branching networks using CT: application to the airway tree.

Authors:  V Sauret; K A Goatman; J S Fleming; A G Bailey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Configurations of the segmental and subsegmental bronchi and arteries in the right upper lobe of the human lung with special reference to their concomitant relations and double subsegmental arterial supply.

Authors:  Tokuo Koshino; Gen Murakami; Toshio J Sato; Mizuyo H Tsugane; Yasuaki Fujisawa; Tohru Mawatari; Tomio Abe; General Murakami
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project.

Authors:  Tomotaka Sobue; Noriyuki Moriyama; Masahiro Kaneko; Masahiko Kusumoto; Toshiaki Kobayashi; Ryosuke Tsuchiya; Ryutaro Kakinuma; Hironobu Ohmatsu; Kanji Nagai; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Eisuke Matsui; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Angles of branching and diameters of branches in the human bronchial tree.

Authors:  K Horsfield; G Cumming
Journal:  Bull Math Biophys       Date:  1967-06

5.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  S Sone; S Takashima; F Li; Z Yang; T Honda; Y Maruyama; M Hasegawa; T Yamanda; K Kubo; K Hanamura; K Asakura
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies.

Authors:  Takeshi Nawa; Tohru Nakagawa; Suzushi Kusano; Yoshimichi Kawasaki; Youichi Sugawara; Hajime Nakata
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Bronchoscopic evaluation of peripheral lung tumours.

Authors:  R J Shiner; J Rosenman; I Katz; N Reichart; E Hershko; A Yellin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.139

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Predicting reachability to peripheral lesions in transbronchial biopsies using CT-derived geometrical attributes of the bronchial route.

Authors:  Masahito Naito; Fumitaro Masaki; Rebecca Lisk; Hisashi Tsukada; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 2.  A Comprehensive Review of Medical Imaging Equipment Used in Cadaveric Studies.

Authors:  Emily Simonds; Charlotte Wilson; Joe Iwanaga; Tyler Laws; Gary Holley; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-07

3.  Predictors of failure of intersegmental line creation using bronchoscopic jet ventilation for thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy.

Authors:  Mizuko Ikeda; Miwako Tanabe; Ayumi Fujimoto; Tomoka Matsuoka; Makoto Sumie; Ken Yamaura
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2021-07-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.