Literature DB >> 15602249

Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery.

Birgit H Fruhstorfer1, Elaine L B Hodgson, Charles M Malata.   

Abstract

Recently, an anatomic breast implant filled with soft cohesive silicone gel was introduced by Mentor Medical Systems onto the European market. This study reports the early experience of a single surgeon with this implant. All patients who received a Contour Profile Gel (CPG) implant from March 2001 to October 2002 were studied. Patient satisfaction with breast shape and consistency was assessed using linear analogue scales with a maximum score of 10. Thirty-five patients received CPG implants for cosmetic (10 patients, 20 breasts) and reconstructive (25 patients, 31 breasts) surgery purposes. Patients were satisfied with their breast shape (mean score: 8.3). Eighty-five percent of the breasts were rated as soft (score >/=6). No serious esthetic complications such as implant malposition or significant capsular contracture were observed. Anatomic soft cohesive gel implants provide excellent results in selected cases. They are well accepted by patients and not associated with an increased rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15602249     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000134508.43550.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  Incidence of capsular contracture in silicone versus saline cosmetic augmentation mammoplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yasser El-Sheikh; Roberto Tutino; Casey Knight; Farough Farrokhyar; Nicolas Hynes
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

2.  Evaluation of the effects of differences in silicone hardness on rat model of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyunseong Kim; Jin Young Hong; Wan-Jin Jeon; Junseon Lee; In-Hyuk Ha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Pa Hong; Seung Soo Kim; Cheol Jeong; Seung Hwan Hwang; Tae Seob Kim; Jung Heum Park; Yun Gyu Song; Yu Kwan Song
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using anatomical implants.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Kim; Dong-Woo Jung; Kyu-Jin Chung; Jun Ho Lee; Tae Gon Kim; Yong-Ha Kim; Soo Jung Lee; Su Hwan Kang; Jung Eun Choi
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  Review of 1,447 breast augmentation patients using PERTHESE silicone implants.

Authors:  Jorge Miguel Psillakis; Paulo Henrique Facchina; Paulo Kharmandayan; Luis Trillo; Waldecir Chiarelo Canzi; Herberti Rosique Aguiar
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  The root canal system: a channel through which we can seed cells into grafts.

Authors:  Gu Cheng; Zu-Bing Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-16

7.  Shaped versus Round Implants for Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-04-07

Review 8.  Silicone breast implant modification review: overcoming capsular contracture.

Authors:  Byung Ho Shin; Byung Hwi Kim; Sujin Kim; Kangwon Lee; Young Bin Choy; Chan Yeong Heo
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2018-12-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.