Literature DB >> 33649929

Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Pa Hong1, Seung Soo Kim2, Cheol Jeong3, Seung Hwan Hwang4, Tae Seob Kim5, Jung Heum Park6, Yun Gyu Song1, Yu Kwan Song7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) is the fifth generation of a silicone gel-filled breast implant that is commercially available in Korea.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we describe 4-year interim results of the safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface in Korean women.
METHODS: In the current multicenter, retrospective study, we performed a retrospective review of medical records of a total of 1314 patients who received augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface at our hospitals between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2020. For safety assessment, we analyzed incidences of postoperative complications and Kaplan-Meier complication-free survival of the patients.
RESULTS: We included a total of 873 patients (1746 breasts, mean age = 32.18 ± 6.88 years) in the current study. There were a total of 111 cases (12.70%) of postoperative complications; these include 24 cases (2.70%) of early seroma, 18 cases (2.10%) of hematoma, 18 cases (2.10%) of capsular contracture, 17 cases (1.95%) of dissatisfaction with shape, 16 cases (1.83%) of dissatisfaction with size, 9 cases (1.03%) of asymmetry, 6 cases (0.70%) of infection and 3 cases (0.34%) of rippling. Moreover, time-to-events were estimated at 918.34 ± 36.22 days (95% CI 845.44-988.52).
CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe 4-year interim results of the safety of augmentation mammaplasty using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface in Korean women in a non-manufacturer-sponsored study. But further large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies with a long period of follow-up are warranted to establish our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilms; Breast; Breast implants; Kaplan–Meier estimate; Magnetic resonance imaging; Seroma

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33649929     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02152-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  66 in total

1.  Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  G Philip Barnsley; Leif J Sigurdson; Shannon E Barnsley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture?

Authors:  N Poeppl; S Schreml; F Lichtenegger; A Lenich; M Eisenmann-Klein; L Prantl
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  The Functional Influence of Breast Implant Outer Shell Morphology on Bacterial Attachment and Growth.

Authors:  Phoebe Jones; Maria Mempin; Honghua Hu; Durdana Chowdhury; Matthew Foley; Rodney Cooter; William P Adams; Karen Vickery; Anand K Deva
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chin-Ho Wong; Miny Samuel; Bien-Keem Tan; Colin Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Long-Term Safety of Textured and Smooth Breast Implants.

Authors:  M Bradley Calobrace; Michael R Schwartz; Kamakshi R Zeidler; Troy A Pittman; Robert Cohen; W Grant Stevens
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study.

Authors:  William P Adams; Jose L Rios; Sharon J Smith
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Diane K Murphy; Araceli Slicton; Patricia S Walker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Clinical Results on Innovation in Breast Implant Design.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Dennis C Hammond
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Breast Implant Surfaces and Their Impact on Current Practices: Where We Are Now and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Mark W Clemens; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-15

10.  Low rate of capsular contracture in a series of 214 consecutive primary and revision breast augmentations using microtextured implants.

Authors:  Brent Tanner
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2017-12-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva ErgonomixTM Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Jie Luan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  High-Resolution Ultrasound-Assisted Assessment of Preliminary Short-term Safety Outcomes of an Implant-Based Augmentation Mammaplasty Using a Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth-Surface Device in Korean Females.

Authors:  Sangdal Lee; Jeong Pil Jeong; Jung Youp Sung; Woo Sik Choi; Dong Seung Moon; Ho Chan Kim; Jae Hong Kim
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2021-11-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.