Literature DB >> 15601330

Australian and New Zealand three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy consensus guidelines for prostate cancer.

M Skala1, M Berry, G Duchesne, K Gogna, K-H Tai, S Turner, A Kneebone, A Rolfo, A Haworth.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) has been shown to reduce normal tissue toxicity and allow dose escalation in the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group initiated a consensus process to generate evidence-based guidelines for the safe and effective implementation of 3DCRT. All radiation oncology departments in Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete a survey of their prostate practice and to send representatives to a consensus workshop. After a review of the evidence, key issues were identified and debated. If agreement was not reached, working parties were formed to make recommendations. Draft guidelines were circulated to workshop participants for approval prior to publication. Where possible, evidence-based recommendations have been made with regard to patient selection, risk stratification, simulation, planning, treatment delivery and toxicity reporting. This is the first time a group of radiation therapists, physicists and oncologists representing professional radiotherapy practice across Australia and New Zealand have worked together to develop best-practice guidelines. These guidelines should serve as a baseline for prospective clinical trials, outcome research and quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15601330     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01354.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  6 in total

1.  Management of low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Gardiner; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Moderate dose escalation in three-dimensional conformal localized prostate cancer radiotherapy: single-institutional experience in 398 patients comparing 66 Gy versus 70 Gy versus 74 Gy.

Authors:  Gregor Goldner; Johannes Dimopoulos; Christian Kirisits; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Does radical treatment have a role in the management of low-risk prostate cancer? The place for brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Scott G Williams; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  MRS-guided HDR brachytherapy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in high risk localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kazi; Guy Godwin; John Simpson; Giuseppe Sasso
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Quality improvement process to assess tattoo alignment, set-up accuracy and isocentre reproducibility in pelvic radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Kelly Elsner; Kate Francis; George Hruby; Stephanie Roderick
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-11-21

6.  Evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation software in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Stuart Greenham; Jenna Dean; Cheuk Kuen Kenneth Fu; Joanne Goman; Jeremy Mulligan; Deanna Tune; David Sampson; Justin Westhuyzen; Michael McKay
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.