Literature DB >> 15599295

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with a voice-controlled robot: the AESOP system.

Chikara Kunisaki1, Shinsuke Hatori, Toshio Imada, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Hidetaka Ono, Yuichi Otsuka, Goro Matsuda, Masato Nomura, Hiroshi Shimada.   

Abstract

The authors attempted to clarify the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with a voice-controlled robot, the AESOP system (3000 HR), and further determine whether innovative surgical equipment could allow the performance of complex thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Thoracoscopic surgery with a voice-controlled robot system has already been used in single-surgeon lung resection. Intra-operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with the AESOP system (n = 15) and patients receiving open surgery (n = 30). In the AESOP group, the volume of blood loss was significantly less, but the total operation time was longer than in the open group. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes or the incidences of morbidity and mortality between the two groups. The surgeon using the AESOP system could obtain a stable, close-up, and long-lasting operative view. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the AESOP system has the potential to enable a single surgeon to perform a complex surgical procedure like esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15599295     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000148468.74546.9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  12 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marc M Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Perceptually Docked Control Environment for Multiple Microbots: Application to the Gastric Wall Biopsy.

Authors:  Ka Wai Kwok; Loi Wah Sun; Valentina Vitiello; David R C James; George P Mylonas; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Rep U S       Date:  2009-10-15

6.  Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano; Satoshi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Li Zhang; Hua Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Wuke Chen; Jianjun He; Ke Wang; Peijun Liu; Yu Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Gang Ma; Xiao Li; Juan Li; Yu Yan; Peijun Liu; Jianjun He; Yu Ren
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Evaluation of a robot-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme.

Authors:  Yong He; Amans Coonar; Sabin Gelvez-Zapata; Post Sastry; Archer Page
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.