Literature DB >> 15598991

Adaptations in horizontal head stabilization in response to altered vision and gaze during natural walking.

Ronita L Cromwell1, Peter E Pidcoe, Lori A Griffin, Tanya Sotillo, Daniel Ganninger, Montgomery Feagin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine adaptations in head stability resulting from altered gaze control and vision during over-ground walking. Using over-ground walking permitted adaptations in walking velocity and cadence that are otherwise not possible during treadmill walking or walking-in-place. Gaze control and vision were manipulated by having 20 young adult subjects 1) walk naturally, 2) view a distant, earth-fixed target to enhance the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), 3) view a head-fixed target to suppress the VOR, and 4) walk in darkness. Horizontal head and trunk angular velocities in space, walking velocity and cadence were measured. Root-mean-square head and trunk angular velocities were calculated and frequency analyses determined head-trunk movement patterns. Results demonstrated that when given the opportunity, subjects slowed down and decreased cadence in response to challenging tasks. Despite strongly reduced walking velocity and cadence, walking in darkness proved most challenging for head stabilization, indicating the importance of vision during this process. Viewing the earth-fixed target demonstrated the greatest head stability thereby, facilitating gaze stabilization. However, comparisons between the earth-fixed and head-fixed target conditions suggest a reciprocal relationship where gaze stability also facilitates head stability. This contribution of gaze stability to head stability is more important than vision alone as the head stabilization response was diminished during the VOR suppressed condition.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  The statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion differ between rodents and primates.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The role of the neck and trunk in facilitating head stability during walking.

Authors:  Justin Kavanagh; Rod Barrett; Steven Morrison
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effect of narrowing the base of support on the gait, gaze and quiet eye of elite ballet dancers and controls.

Authors:  Derek Panchuk; Joan N Vickers
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-03-08

4.  Statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion: implications for neural processing.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Stabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates.

Authors:  Donald C Dunbar; Jane M Macpherson; Roger W Simmons; Athina Zarcades
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Head movement during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Humza N Zubair; Irina N Beloozerova; Hai Sun; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.