Literature DB >> 19043061

Stabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates.

Donald C Dunbar1, Jane M Macpherson, Roger W Simmons, Athina Zarcades.   

Abstract

Segmental kinematics were investigated in horses during overground locomotion and compared with published reports on humans and other primates to determine the impact of a large neck on rotational mobility (> 20 deg.) and stability (< or = 20 deg.) of the head and trunk. Three adult horses (Equus caballus) performing walks, trots and canters were videotaped in lateral view. Data analysis included locomotor velocity, segmental positions, pitch and linear displacements and velocities, and head displacement frequencies. Equine, human and monkey skulls and cervical spines were measured to estimate eye and vestibular arc length during head pitch displacements. Horses stabilized all three segments in all planes during all three gaits, unlike monkeys and humans who make large head pitch and yaw rotations during walks, and monkeys that make large trunk pitch rotations during gallops. Equine head angular displacements and velocities, with some exceptions during walks, were smaller than in humans and other primates. Nevertheless, owing to greater off-axis distances, orbital and vestibular arc lengths remained larger in horses, with the exception of head-neck axial pitch during trots, in which equine arc lengths were smaller than in running humans. Unlike monkeys and humans, equine head peak-frequency ranges fell within the estimated range in which inertia has a compensatory stabilizing effect. This inertial effect was typically over-ridden, however, by muscular or ligamentous intervention. Thus, equine head pitch was not consistently compensatory, as reported in humans. The equine neck isolated the head from the trunk enabling both segments to provide a spatial reference frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043061      PMCID: PMC2768006          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  60 in total

1.  Somatic graviception.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Evidence of somatic graviception from new and classical investigations.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1995

4.  Segment inertial properties of primates: new techniques for laboratory and field studies of locomotion.

Authors:  R H Crompton; Y Li; R M Alexander; W Wang; M M Gunther
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Shifts in blood volume alter the perception of posture.

Authors:  D Vaitl; H Mittelstaedt; F Baisch
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 6.  Origin and processing of postural information.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Modeling study of compensatory head movements in lame horses.

Authors:  M A Vorstenbosch; H H Buchner; H H Savelberg; H C Schamhardt; A Barneveld
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Interaction of eye-, head-, and trunk-bound information in spatial perception and control.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Firing properties of head direction cells in the rat anterior thalamic nucleus: dependence on vestibular input.

Authors:  R W Stackman; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Functional anatomy of the head-neck movement system of quadrupedal and bipedal mammals.

Authors:  W Graf; C de Waele; P P Vidal
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  21 in total

1.  Gravito-inertial ambiguity resolved through head stabilization.

Authors:  Ildar Farkhatdinov; Hannah Michalska; Alain Berthoz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Timing of head movements is consistent with energy minimization in walking ungulates.

Authors:  David M Loscher; Fiete Meyer; Kerstin Kracht; John A Nyakatura
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effector-dependent stochastic reference frame transformations alter decision-making.

Authors:  T Scott Murdison; Dominic I Standage; Philippe Lefèvre; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Fore-Aft Asymmetry Improves the Stability of Trotting in the Transverse Plane: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Mau Adachi; Shinya Aoi; Tomoya Kamimura; Kazuo Tsuchiya; Fumitoshi Matsuno
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Gaze shifts and fixations dominate gaze behavior of walking cats.

Authors:  T J Rivers; M G Sirota; A I Guttentag; D A Ogorodnikov; N A Shah; I N Beloozerova
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  From maturity to old age: tasks of daily life require a different muscle use in horses.

Authors:  R R Zsoldos; B Krüger; T F Licka
Journal:  Comp Exerc Physiol       Date:  2014-07-07

7.  Gaze coordination with strides during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Humza N Zubair; Kevin M I Chu; Justin L Johnson; Trevor J Rivers; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 6.228

8.  An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Hobbs; John E A Bertram; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Assessing morphology and function of the semicircular duct system: introducing new in-situ visualization and software toolbox.

Authors:  R David; A Stoessel; A Berthoz; F Spoor; D Bennequin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Head movement during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Humza N Zubair; Irina N Beloozerova; Hai Sun; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.