Literature DB >> 15598341

Split liver transplantation: past, present and future.

J S Kim1, D C Broering, R Y Tustas, L Fischer, R Ganschow, M Burdelski, X Rogiers.   

Abstract

The technique of liver splitting offers an effective way of increasing the donor pool and decreasing pediatric waiting list mortality. A donor liver is divided in such a way that the left lateral liver graft can be transplanted into a small child and the right extended liver graft into an adult. This innovative technique did not harm the adult recipient pool. Because of its technical complexity and the initial poor results after split liver transplantation (SLT) this procedure has slowly gained acceptance in the Transplantation Community after its first introduction in 1988 (4). Small children with end stage liver disease suffered the most from the extreme shortage of cadaveric donor organs due to the difficulty of finding size-matched donors. The successful surgical development of SLT and a better donor and recipient selection have led to a reduction of the pediatric pretransplant mortality to nearly zero and to results comparable with those after whole organ transplantation (WLT). By splitting a donor organ into two 'full' hemi-grafts and providing a small adult ( < 60 kg) or a big child ( > 30 kg) with the full left graft and a medium-sized adult (60-80 kg) with the full right graft, a small-for-size situation for adolescents or adults can be avoided and the total number of available grafts can be increased. It is the goal to provide each recipient with its customized graft in the near future. However, splitting for two adults requires high technical skills and profound knowledge of the anatomic variations and should be performed in centers with large transplantation experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598341     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  6 in total

1.  [Liver transplantation. From innovation to routine].

Authors:  M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Marco Spada; Silvia Riva; Giuseppe Maggiore; Davide Cintorino; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Decision modelling for economic evaluation of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Zhi Qu; Christian Krauth; Volker Eric Amelung; Alexander Kaltenborn; Jill Gwiasda; Lena Harries; Jan Beneke; Harald Schrem; Sebastian Liersch
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  In Situ Split Liver Transplantation for 2 Adult Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Dong-Hwan Jung; Shin Hwang; Gi-Won Song; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Ki-Hun Kim; Tae-Yong Ha; Gil-Chun Park; Wan-Jun Kim; Woo-Hyoung Kang; Seok-Hwan Kim; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.530

5.  Prognosis of Split Liver Transplantation Compared with Whole Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients: Single-center Results under the Korean MELD Score-based Allocation Policy.

Authors:  Gil Chun Park; Shin Hwang; Gi Won Song; Dong Hwan Jung; Tae Yong Ha; Chul Soo Ahn; Deok Bog Moon; Ki Hun Kim; Young In Yoon; Woo Hyoung Kang; Hwui Dong Cho; Jin Uk Choi; Minjae Kim; Byeong Gon Na; Sang Hoon Kim; Sung Gyu Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Fates of retained hepatic segment IV and its prognostic impact in adult split liver transplantation using an extended right liver graft.

Authors:  Yong-Kyu Chung; Shin Hwang; Chul-Soo Ahn; Ki-Hun Kim; Deok-Bog Moon; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Gil-Chun Park; Young-In Yoon; Woo-Hyoung Kang; Hwui-Dong Cho; Jin Uk Choi; Minjae Kim; Sang Hoon Kim; Byeong-Gon Na; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.