Literature DB >> 15597891

Deviation from additivity with estrogenic mixtures containing 4-nonylphenol and 4-tert-octylphenol detected in the E-SCREEN assay.

Nissanka Rajapakse1, Elisabete Silva, Martin Scholze, Andreas Kortenkamp.   

Abstract

An intriguing deviation from expected additivity is reported with mixtures containing 17beta-estradiol, 17alpha-ethinylestradiol, genistein, bisphenol A, 4-nonylphenol, and 4-tert-octylphenol. The effect of these chemicals on the proliferation of estrogen-dependent MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (the E-SCREEN) was measured. Data variance-component analyses, carried out to optimize the assay for mixture studies, showed that between-experiment variability was the dominant source of data variation. Adoption of a data-normalization procedure reduced the impact of this variability and allowed the pooling of historical E-SCREEN data. Concentration-response relationships for all six chemicals were recorded and utilized to calculate predictions of their joint effects by employing the model of concentration addition. Surprisingly, the observed combination effects of the mixture fell short of the additivity expectations, indicating weak antagonism. Experimental or prediction errors were ruled out as possible explanations for this deviation, which suggested that it might be the result of interactions between mixture components. With the aim of identifying the responsible components, mixtures were designed by excluding one or more of the chemicals from the original six-component mixture, and the resulting combination effects were assessed. These permutation studies allowed us to conclude thatthe presence of 4-nonylphenol and 4-tert-octylphenol is associated with the antagonisms observed with the six-component mixture and thus negatively affected the predictability of mixture effects. Future mixture studies utilizing the E-SCREEN with endocrine disrupters that also exhibit toxicity or growth-inhibitory effects will have to take account of the possibility that such interactions might compromise the predictability of estrogenic combination effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15597891     DOI: 10.1021/es049681e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  23 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Can endocrine disruptors influence neuroplasticity in the aging brain?

Authors:  Bernard Weiss
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Predicting the Activation of the Androgen Receptor by Mixtures of Ligands Using Generalized Concentration Addition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Schlezinger; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Prenatal Exposure to Unconventional Oil and Gas Operation Chemical Mixtures Altered Mammary Gland Development in Adult Female Mice.

Authors:  Sarah A Sapouckey; Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

5.  Assessing the combination effects of environmental estrogens in fish.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Fan-Xiang Kong; Yang Yu; Xiao-Li Shi; Min Zhang; Hong-Er Tian
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Predicting the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance mixtures on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity in vitro.

Authors:  Greylin Nielsen; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Increased expression of histone proteins during estrogen-mediated cell proliferation.

Authors:  Zheying Zhu; Robert J Edwards; Alan R Boobis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Considering the cumulative risk of mixtures of chemicals - a challenge for policy makers.

Authors:  Denis A Sarigiannis; Ute Hansen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Assessment of xenoestrogens using three distinct estrogen receptors and the zebrafish brain aromatase gene in a highly responsive glial cell system.

Authors:  Yann Le Page; Martin Scholze; Olivier Kah; Farzad Pakdel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Additive mixture effects of estrogenic chemicals in human cell-based assays can be influenced by inclusion of chemicals with differing effect profiles.

Authors:  Richard Mark Evans; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.