Literature DB >> 15596372

Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.

Botond K Szabó1, Peter Aspelin, Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVE: An artificial neural network (ANN)-based segmentation method was developed for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast and compared with quantitative and empiric parameter mapping techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population was composed of 10 patients with seven malignant and three benign lesions undergoing dynamic MR imaging of the breast. All lesions were biopsied or surgically excised, and examined by means of histopathology. A T1-weighted 3D FLASH (fast low angle shot sequence) was acquired before and seven times after the intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. Motion artifacts on MR images were eliminated by voxel-based affine and nonrigid registration techniques. A two-layered feed-forward back-propagation network was created for pixel-by-pixel classification of signal intensity-time curves into benign/malignant tissue types. ANN output was statistically compared with percent-enhancement (E), signal enhancement ratio (SER), time-to-peak, subtracted signal intensity (SUB), pharmacokinetic parameter rate constant (k(ep)), and correlation coefficient to a predefined reference washout curve.
RESULTS: ANN was successfully applied to the classification of breast MR images identifying structures with benign or malignant enhancement kinetics. Correlation coefficient (logistic regression, odds ratio [OR] = 12.9; 95% CI: 7.7-21.8), k(ep) (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2-2.6), and time-to-peak (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7) were independently associated to ANN output classes. SER, E, and SUB were nonsignificant covariates.
CONCLUSION: ANN is capable of classifying breast lesions on MR images. Mapping correlation coefficient, k(ep) and time-to-peak showed the highest association with the ANN result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15596372     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  14 in total

1.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification.

Authors:  Shannon C Agner; Salil Soman; Edward Libfeld; Margie McDonald; Kathleen Thomas; Sarah Englander; Mark A Rosen; Deanna Chin; John Nosher; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors:  Kathinka D Kurz; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Reinhart Willers; Dirk Blondin; Ulrich Mödder; Andreas Saleh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines.

Authors:  J Levman; T Leung; P Causer; D Plewes; A L Martel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Treatment response assessment of breast masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scans using fuzzy c-means clustering and level set segmentation.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark Helvie; Thomas Chenevert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Effect of the enhancement threshold on the computer-aided detection of breast cancer using MRI.

Authors:  Jacob E D Levman; Petrina Causer; Ellen Warner; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Automated bony region identification using artificial neural networks: reliability and validation measurements.

Authors:  Esther E Gassman; Stephanie M Powell; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Nicole A Devries; Kiran H Shivanna; Vincent A Magnotta; Austin J Ramme; Brian D Adams; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  STEP: spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Sarah Englander; Sajjad Baloch; Evangelia I Zacharaki; Yong Fan; Mitchell D Schnall; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Spectral embedding based active contour (SEAC) for lesion segmentation on breast dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Shannon C Agner; Jun Xu; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Hon J Yu; Yong Chu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.