Literature DB >> 15596273

Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study.

Diogo Ayres-de-Campos1, Cristina Costa-Santos, João Bernardes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capacity of computer analysis of antepartum cardiotocographs performed by SisPorto 2.0 in predicting neonatal outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective observational study was conducted in eight tertiary care centres in Europe and Australia, involving pregnant women in the absence of labor, scheduled for elective caesarean section, whose last fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing was performed within 4h of delivery. After exclusion of fetal malformations, multiple pregnancies, tracings with less than 30 min, tracings with more than 15% signal loss, difficult fetal extractions, and anesthesia complications, a total of 345 cases were analyzed. Computer quantification of cardiotocographic parameters was compared with newborn Apgar score, umbilical artery pH, metabolic acidosis and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: Acceleration number, mean short-term variability, percentage of abnormal short-term variability and percentage of abnormal long-term variability had an excellent discriminative capacity to predict 1-min Apgar scores under or equal to 4 (areas under the ROC curve 0.96-1.00). The same parameters showed a slightly lower capacity to predict 5-min Apgar scores under or equal to 6 (areas under the ROC curve 0.81-0.89). The best cut-off values for these parameters, derived from the previously referred calculations, detected all cases of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 2). Cardiotocographic parameters showed a lower discriminative capacity in prediction of umbilical artery pH <7.20 (maximum area under the ROC curve 0.66) and <7.15 (maximum area under the ROC curve 0.69).
CONCLUSIONS: Computerized quantification of accelerations and variability in the antepartum allows a good prediction of 1 and 5-min Apgar scores, and to a much lesser degree umbilical artery pH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15596273     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability.

Authors:  Adam J Wolfberg; David J Derosier; Trevor Roberts; Zeeshan Syed; Gari D Clifford; David Acker; Adre Du Plessis
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-02

2.  Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability.

Authors:  Hernâni Gonçalves; Antónia Costa; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Cristina Costa-Santos; Ana Paula Rocha; João Bernardes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Parasympathetic tone variations according to umbilical cord pH at birth: a computerized fetal heart rate variability analysis.

Authors:  Laura Butruille; Julien De Jonckheere; Mathilde Flocteil; Charles Garabedian; Véronique Houfflin-Debarge; Laurent Storme; Philippe Deruelle; Régis Logier
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Heart rate markers for prediction of fetal acidosis in an experimental study on fetal sheep.

Authors:  Louise Ghesquière; C Ternynck; D Sharma; Y Hamoud; R Vanspranghels; L Storme; V Houfflin-Debarge; J De Jonckheere; C Garabedian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities.

Authors:  Paula Pinto; Cristina Costa-Santos; Hernâni Gonçalves; Diogo Ayres-De-Campos; João Bernardes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of Foetal Heart Rate Variability with Traditional Indexes: A Critical Survey.

Authors:  Maria Romano; Luigi Iuppariello; Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione; Giovanni Improta; Paolo Bifulco; Mario Cesarelli
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.