Literature DB >> 15593073

Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management.

Theresa A Brimner1, Gordon James Gallivan, Gerald R Stephenson.   

Abstract

The growth of herbicide-resistant canola varieties increased from 10% of the canola area in Canada in 1996, when the technology was first introduced, to 80% in 2000. From 1995 to 2000, the amount of herbicide active ingredient applied per hectare of canola declined by 42.8% and the Environmental Impact (EI) per hectare, calculated using the Environmental Impact Quotient for individual herbicides and the amounts of active ingredients applied, declined 36.8%. The amount of herbicide active ingredient per hectare applied to conventional canola was consistently higher than that applied to herbicide-resistant canola each year between 1996 and 2000. Similarly, the EI of herbicide use per hectare in conventional canola was higher than that of herbicide-resistant canola during the same time period. Since 1996, herbicide use has shifted from broadcast applications of soil-active herbicides to post-emergence applications of herbicides with broad-spectrum foliar activity. The decline in herbicide use and EI since the introduction of herbicide-resistant varieties was due to increased use of chemicals with lower application rates, a reduced number of applications and a decreased need for herbicide combinations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15593073     DOI: 10.1002/ps.967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  13 in total

1.  Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops.

Authors:  Thomas E Nickson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Effect of two commercial herbicides on life history traits of a human disease vector, Aedes aegypti, in the laboratory setting.

Authors:  Alexandra Morris; Ebony G Murrell; Talan Klein; Bruce H Noden
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.

Authors:  Graham Brookes; Peter Barfoot
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Mathias Cougnon; Sofie Vergucht; Robert Bulcke; Geert Haesaert; Walter Steurbaut; Dirk Reheul
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Weed control changes and genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops in the USA 1996-2012.

Authors:  Graham Brookes
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.074

6.  Key global environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2012.

Authors:  Peter Barfoot; Graham Brookes
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.074

7.  Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2015: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.

Authors:  Graham Brookes; Peter Barfoot
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.074

8.  The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: two different scientific points of view.

Authors:  M Buiatti; P Christou; G Pastore
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.523

9.  Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2014: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.

Authors:  Graham Brookes; Peter Barfoot
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.074

10.  Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in U.S. maize and soybeans.

Authors:  Edward D Perry; Federico Ciliberto; David A Hennessy; GianCarlo Moschini
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.