Literature DB >> 18404410

Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize.

Yann Devos1, Mathias Cougnon, Sofie Vergucht, Robert Bulcke, Geert Haesaert, Walter Steurbaut, Dirk Reheul.   

Abstract

With the potential advent of genetically modified herbicide-resistant (GMHR) crops in the European Union, changes in patterns of herbicide use are predicted. Broad-spectrum, non-selective herbicides used with GMHR crops are expected to substitute for a set of currently used herbicides, which might alter the agro-environmental footprint from crop production. To test this hypothesis, the environmental impact of various herbicide regimes currently used with non-GMHR maize in Belgium was calculated and compared with that of possible herbicide regimes applied in GMHR maize. Impacts on human health and the environment were calculated through the pesticide occupational and environmental risk (POCER) indicator. Results showed that the environmental impact of herbicide regimes solely relying on the active ingredients glyphosate (GLY) or glufosinate-ammonium (GLU) is lower than that of herbicide regimes applied in non-GMHR maize. Due to the lower potential of GLY and GLU to contaminate ground water and their lower acute toxicity to aquatic organisms, the POCER exceedence factor values for the environment were reduced approximately by a sixth when GLY or GLU is used alone. However, the environmental impact of novel herbicide regimes tested may be underestimated due to the assumption that active ingredients used with GMHR maize would be used alone. Data retrieved from literature suggest that weed control efficacy is increased and resistance development delayed when GLY or GLU is used together with other herbicides in the GMHR system. Due to the partial instead of complete replacement of currently used herbicide regimes, the beneficial environmental impact of novel herbicide regimes might sometimes be reduced or counterbalanced. Despite the high weed control efficacy provided by the biotechnology-based weed management strategy, neither indirect harmful effects on farmland biodiversity through losses in food resources and shelter, nor shifts in weed communities have been demonstrated in GMHR maize yet. However, with the increasing adoption rate of GMHR maize and their associated novel herbicide regimes, this situation is expected to change in the short-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404410     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-008-9181-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  37 in total

1.  Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.

Authors:  R Lal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops.

Authors:  Les Firbank; Mark Lonsdale; Guy Poppy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Agbiotech. A growing threat down on the farm.

Authors:  Robert F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability.

Authors:  David R Montgomery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Environmental fate of herbicides trifluralin, metazachlor, metamitron and sulcotrione compared with that of glyphosate, a substitute broad spectrum herbicide for different glyphosate-resistant crops.

Authors:  Laure Mamy; Enrique Barriuso; Benoît Gabrielle
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  Invertebrate biodiversity in maize following withdrawal of triazine herbicides.

Authors:  David R Brooks; Suzanne J Clark; Joe N Perry; David A Bohan; Gillian T Champion; Les G Firbank; Alison J Haughton; Cathy Hawes; Matthew S Heard; Ian P Woiwod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The effect of the herbicide glyphosate on non-target spiders: Part II. Indirect effects on Lepthyphantes tenuis in field margins.

Authors:  A J Haughton; J R Bell; N D Boatman; A Wilcox
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  Ban on triazine herbicides likely to reduce but not negate relative benefits of GMHT maize cropping.

Authors:  J N Perry; L G Firbank; G T Champion; S J Clark; M S Heard; M J May; C Hawes; G R Squire; P Rothery; I P Woiwod; J D Pidgeon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Dicamba resistance: enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies.

Authors:  Mark R Behrens; Nedim Mutlu; Sarbani Chakraborty; Razvan Dumitru; Wen Zhi Jiang; Bradley J Lavallee; Patricia L Herman; Thomas E Clemente; Donald P Weeks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Invertebrates and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

Authors:  D B Roy; D A Bohan; A J Haughton; M O Hill; J L Osborne; S J Clark; J N Perry; P Rothery; R J Scott; D R Brooks; G T Champion; C Hawes; M S Heard; L G Firbank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  1 in total

1.  Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs.

Authors:  Marion Dolezel; Marianne Miklau; Andreas Heissenberger; Wolfram Reichenbecher
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.893

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.