Literature DB >> 15591157

Role of gustatory thalamus in anticipation and comparison of rewards over time in rats.

Pearl Lee Schroy1, Robert A Wheeler, Collin Davidson, Giuseppe Scalera, Robert C Twining, Patricia S Grigson.   

Abstract

Rats reduce intake of a palatable saccharin solution when it is followed by access to a preferred sucrose solution. This phenomenon, referred to as an anticipatory contrast effect (ACE), is thought to occur because the value of the saccharin conditioned stimulus pales in comparison to the highly rewarding sucrose unconditioned stimulus expected in the near future. Although relatively little is known about the underlying neural substrates, lesions of the gustatory thalamus fully disrupt the phenomenon (Reilly S, Bornovalova M, and Trifunovic R. Behav Neurosci 118: 365-376, 2004; Reilly S and Pritchard TC. Behav Neurosci 110: 746-759, 1996). The present set of experiments revisited this issue to determine the nature of this deficit. Rats with bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the gustatory thalamus were given 3-min access to 0.15% saccharin and, after a 0-s or 5-min interval, were given 3-min access to either the same saccharin solution or a highly preferred 1.0 M sucrose solution. In experiment 1, ACE testing began with the 5-min interstimulus interval (ISI) and then switched to the 0-s ISI. For experiment 2, the order of ISI testing was reversed. The results show that axon-sparing, neurotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus prevent ACEs with a 0-s ISI and lead to a reversal (i.e., a reinforcement effect) with a 5-min ISI. Together, the results suggest that the lesion leads to a specific reward comparison deficit, whereby the rats fail to compare the value of an available reward with the memory of a preferred reward that is anticipated in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15591157     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00292.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  25 in total

1.  Drug-motivated behavior in rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area.

Authors:  Jennifer E Nyland; Danielle N Alexander; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Reward Comparison: The Achilles' heel and hope for addiction.

Authors:  Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Models       Date:  2008

3.  Fischer rats are more sensitive than Lewis rats to the suppressive effects of morphine and the aversive kappa-opioid agonist spiradoline.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Robert A Wheeler; Ellen Leuenberger; Nicole A S Mosblech; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Chemosensory processing in the taste - reward pathway.

Authors:  Ranier Gutierrez; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Christopher S Freet; Patricia S Grigson; Ralph Norgren
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

6.  Lewis rats are more sensitive than Fischer rats to successive negative contrast, but less sensitive to the anxiolytic and appetite-stimulating effects of chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Jason D Tesche; Dennie M Tompers; Katherine E Riegel; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Insular cortex lesions and morphine-induced suppression of conditioned stimulus intake in the rat.

Authors:  Christopher Roman; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake.

Authors:  Rastafa I Geddes; Li Han; Anne E Baldwin; Ralph Norgren; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 10.  The state of the reward comparison hypothesis: theoretical comment on Huang and Hsiao (2008).

Authors:  Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.