Literature DB >> 15588059

What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague?

Ricardo Wray1, Keri Jupka.   

Abstract

We used formative research to assess the information needs and information-seeking strategies with general public audience segments in response to a hypothetical attack using plague, and we pretested informational materials about plague. Twelve focus groups were conducted across the country, with 129 individuals being purposively sampled by ethnicity and place of residence. Across groups, participants wanted to understand: the nature of the threat of plague, how to protect themselves from transmission, how to detect exposure and symptoms, how to treat infection, and progress in apprehending perpetrators. Participants reported that they would seek information from both the news media and local authorities. Based on the findings and the challenges posed by a terrorist attack using plague, the authors recommend that message materials answer key questions, provide clear action steps, be clear and easily understood, include sources for credibility, and reflect full government disclosure. A dissemination plan is required to ensure that critical information will be available when people need it and where they look.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15588059     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  9 in total

Review 1.  Communications in public health emergency preparedness: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Leesa Lin; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2013-09

2.  The Minimization of Public Health Risks in Newspapers after Hurricane Katrina.

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Santosh Vijaykumar; Ricardo Wray; Ajlina Karamehic
Journal:  Commun Res Rep       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Steven M Becker; Neil Henderson; Deborah Glik; Keri Jupka; Sarah Middleton; Carson Henderson; Allison Drury; Elizabeth W Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Public Understanding of Medical Countermeasures.

Authors:  Brooke Fisher Liu; Sandra C Quinn; Michael Egnoto; Vicki Freimuth; Natalie Boonchaisri
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2017-04-07

5.  How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Thomas F Gordon; Laurie Maurer; Judith Greener; Gabriella Mora; Dominique Ruggieri; Caitlin Wolak; Claudia Parvanta
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 6.  Preparedness and Preventive Behaviors for a Pandemic Disaster Caused by COVID-19 in Serbia.

Authors:  Vladimir M Cvetković; Neda Nikolić; Una Radovanović Nenadić; Adem Öcal; Eric K Noji; Miodrag Zečević
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Perceptions and reactions with regard to pneumonic plague.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Richard Amlot; M Brooke Rogers; Ian Hall; Steve Leach; John Simpson; Simon Wessely
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Effective media communication of disasters: pressing problems and recommendations.

Authors:  Wilson Lowrey; William Evans; Karla K Gower; Jennifer A Robinson; Peter M Ginter; Lisa C McCormick; Maziar Abdolrasulnia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Contextual Factors Among Indiscriminate or Large Attacks on Food or Water Supplies, 1946-2015.

Authors:  Julii Brainard; Paul R Hunter
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.