Literature DB >> 15588058

Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials.

Steven M Becker1.   

Abstract

With the threat posed by terrorism involving radioactive materials now high on the nation's agenda, local, state, and federal agencies are moving to enhance preparedness and response capabilities. Crucial to these efforts is the development of effective risk communication strategies. This article reports findings from an ongoing study of risk communication issues in nuclear/radiological terrorism situations. It is part of a larger CDC-funded effort that aims to better understand communication challenges associated with weapons of mass destruction terrorism incidents. Presented here are formative research findings from 16 focus groups (n = 163) in which a multi-part, hypothetical radioactive materials terrorism situation was discussed. Twelve of the focus groups were carried out with members of the general public (drawn from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and geographic locations), and four groups were composed of first responders, hospital emergency department personnel, and public health professionals. One aim of the focus groups was to elicit detailed information on people's knowledge, views, perceptions, reactions, and concerns related to a nuclear/radiological terrorism event, and to better understand people's specific information needs and preferred information sources. A second aim was to pretest draft informational materials prepared by CDC and NIOSH. Key findings for the public and professional groups are presented, and the implications of the research for developing messages in radiological/nuclear terrorism situations are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15588058     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  14 in total

1.  Communicating risk to the public after radiological incidents.

Authors:  Steven M Becker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-01

2.  Evaluation of potassium iodide prophylaxis knowledge and nuclear emergency preparedness: New Jersey 2005.

Authors:  James Blando; Corwin Robertson; Katina Pearl; Carline Dixon; Martin Valcin; Eddy Bresnitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Steven M Becker; Neil Henderson; Deborah Glik; Keri Jupka; Sarah Middleton; Carson Henderson; Allison Drury; Elizabeth W Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Assessment of medical reserve corps volunteers' emergency response willingness using a threat- and efficacy-based model.

Authors:  Nicole A Errett; Daniel J Barnett; Carol B Thompson; Rob Tosatto; Brad Austin; Samuel Schaffzin; Armin Ansari; Natalie L Semon; Ran D Balicer; Jonathan M Links
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2013-03-11

5.  How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Thomas F Gordon; Laurie Maurer; Judith Greener; Gabriella Mora; Dominique Ruggieri; Caitlin Wolak; Claudia Parvanta
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016-09-01

6.  Attitudes and perceptions of urban African Americans of a "dirty bomb" radiological terror event: results of a qualitative study and implications for effective risk communication.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Judith R Greener; Dominique Ruggieri; Claudia Parvanta; Gabriella Mora; Caitlin Wolak; Rebecca Normile; Thomas F Gordon
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.385

7.  Health implications of radiological terrorism: Perspectives from Israel.

Authors:  Moti Hagby; Avishay Goldberg; Steven Becker; Dagan Schwartz; Yaron Bar-Dayan
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-05

8.  A challenging empirical question: What are the effects of media on psychogenic illness during a community crisis?

Authors:  Elizabeth Bass; Evonne Kaplan-Liss; Dennis Dorf; Joan E Broderick
Journal:  J Community Med Health Educ       Date:  2012-01-01

9.  Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Lisa Page; Oliver Morgan; Richard J Pinder; Paul Riley; Stephani Hatch; Helen Maguire; Mike Catchpole; John Simpson; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-01

10.  Guidelines for exposure assessment in health risk studies following a nuclear reactor accident.

Authors:  André Bouville; Martha S Linet; Maureen Hatch; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.