Literature DB >> 15586625

Clinical experience with ximelagatran in orthopaedic surgery.

Bengt Eriksson1.   

Abstract

Patients who undergo orthopaedic surgery are at substantially increased risk for venous thromboembolic events. These include proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis, with the former more likely to lead to pulmonary embolism and fatal complications. Anticoagulants are routinely used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement surgery. Although current treatments offer effective prophylaxis, they have disadvantages. Warfarin is limited by the requirement for coagulation monitoring to ensure effective and safe use. Similarly, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have disadvantages, including the need for parenteral administration. This article brings together data from clinical trials of the novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee replacement. The ximelagatran clinical trial programme in orthopaedic surgery has focused primarily on five large multicentre studies in Europe (the Melagatran Thromboprophylaxis in Orthopaedic surgery II and III and Expanded Prophylaxis Evaluation Surgery Study studies) and in the United States (the Exanta Used to Lessen Thrombosis A and B studies), which enrolled more than 8000 patients. In addition, the USA clinical trial programme included three other trials that investigated ximelagatran in orthopaedic surgery; two of these studies focused on prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement, and one study investigated prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement. These studies compared ximelagatran with the LMWHs dalteparin and enoxaparin and with warfarin, and were designed to reflect regional differences in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and to build on findings from previous studies. Generally, ximelagatran has been shown to possess comparable or greater efficacy relative to comparators. The timing and dose of ximelagatran have been shown to be important determinants of its efficacy and safety. As ximelagatran can be given in fixed oral dosing without coagulation monitoring, it is an attractive choice for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major elective orthopaedic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586625     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200464001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  W H Geerts; J A Heit; G P Clagett; G F Pineo; C W Colwell; F A Anderson; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Deep vein thrombosis: prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment--lessons from orthopedic studies.

Authors:  G D Paiement; C Desautels
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Timing of initial administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in patients following elective hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  R D Hull; G F Pineo; P D Stein; A F Mah; S M MacIsaac; O E Dahl; W A Ghali; M S Butcher; R F Brant; D Bergqvist; K Hamulyák; C W Francis; V J Marder; G E Raskob
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-10

4.  Comparison of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran with enoxaparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: a phase 2 dose-finding study.

Authors:  J A Heit; C W Colwell; C W Francis; J S Ginsberg; S D Berkowitz; J Whipple; G Peters
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-08

5.  Ximelagatran versus warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Charles W Francis; Bruce L Davidson; Scott D Berkowitz; Paul A Lotke; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Jay R Lieberman; Anne K Webster; James P Whipple; Gary R Peters; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A dose-ranging study of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, and its subcutaneous form, melagatran, compared with dalteparin in the prophylaxis of thromboembolism after hip or knee replacement: METHRO I. MElagatran for THRombin inhibition in Orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Bengt I Eriksson; Ann-Christin Arfwidsson; Lars Frison; Ulf G Eriksson; Anders Bylock; Peter Kälebo; Gunnar Fager; David Gustafsson
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Pharmacokinetics of melagatran and the effect on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran: a population model analysis.

Authors:  Ulf G Eriksson; Jaap W Mandema; Mats O Karlsson; Lars Frison; Per Olsson Gisleskog; Ulrika Wählby; Bengt Hamrén; David Gustafsson; Bengt I Eriksson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran in comparison with enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  Bengt I Eriksson; Giancarlo Agnelli; Alexander T Cohen; Ola E Dahl; Patrick Mouret; Nadia Rosencher; Christina Eskilson; Ingela Nylander; Lars Frison; Mats Ogren
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 9.  Venous thromboembolism prevention with LMWHs in medical and orthopedic surgery patients.

Authors:  Steven B Deitelzweig; Gordon J Vanscoy; Cynthia S Niccolai; Thomas L Rihn
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Karin Wåhlander; Torbjörn Lundström; Solveig Billing Clason; Henry Eriksson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.