Literature DB >> 12379064

Ximelagatran versus warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind trial.

Charles W Francis1, Bruce L Davidson, Scott D Berkowitz, Paul A Lotke, Jeffrey S Ginsberg, Jay R Lieberman, Anne K Webster, James P Whipple, Gary R Peters, Clifford W Colwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is used for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, it is associated with rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of approximately 38% to 55% and requires routine coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustment. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has shown promising efficacy and tolerability in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ximelagatran and warfarin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.
SETTING: 74 North American hospitals. PATIENTS: 680 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. INTERVENTION: 7 to 12 days of treatment with oral ximelagatran, 24 mg twice daily, starting on the morning after surgery, or warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.5 [range, 1.8 to 3.0]), starting on the evening of the day of surgery. MEASUREMENTS: Principal end points were asymptomatic DVT on mandatory venography; symptomatic DVT confirmed by ultrasonography or venography; symptomatic, objectively proven pulmonary embolism; and bleeding. All were assessed by blinded adjudication locally and at a central study laboratory.
RESULTS: On central adjudication, incidence of venous thromboembolism was 19.2% (53 of 276 patients) in the ximelagatran group and 25.7% (67 of 261 patients) in the warfarin group (difference, -6.5 percentage points [95% CI, -13.5 to 0.6 percentage points]; P = 0.070). On local assessment, incidence was 25.4% in the ximelagatran group and 33.5% in the warfarin group (P = 0.043). In the ximelagatran and warfarin groups, respectively, major bleeding occurred in 1.7% and 0.9% of patients and minor bleeding occurred in 7.8% and 6.4% of patients. No variables related to bleeding differed significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: For prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, fixed-dose ximelagatran started the morning after total knee arthroplasty is well tolerated and at least as effective as warfarin, but it does not require coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12379064     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  33 in total

1.  No influence of ethnic origin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, to healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Linda C Johansson; Magnus Andersson; Gunnar Fager; David Gustafsson; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Barriers to the use of warfarin: potential solutions.

Authors:  John H McAnulty
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of vitamin K antagonists: warfarin, phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol.

Authors:  Mike Ufer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  The use of novel oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis after elective major orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Saleh Rachidi; Ehab Saad Aldin; Charles Greenberg; Barton Sachs; Michael Streiff; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 5.  A review of the clinical uses of ximelagatran in thrombosis syndromes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bergsrud; Pritesh J Gandhi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  No influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

Authors:  Troy C Sarich; Renli Teng; Gary R Peters; Maria Wollbratt; Robert Homolka; Mia Svensson; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, are not influenced by acetylsalicylic acid.

Authors:  Gunnar Fager; Marie Cullberg; Maria Eriksson-Lepkowska; Lars Frison; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Influence of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral ximelagatran and subcutaneous melagatran.

Authors:  Ulf G Eriksson; Susanne Johansson; Per-Ola Attman; Henrik Mulec; Lars Frison; Gunnar Fager; Ola Samuelsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  No influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor.

Authors:  Karin Wåhlander; Maria Eriksson-Lepkowska; Lars Frison; Gunnar Fager; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has a low potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Eva Bredberg; Tommy B Andersson; Lars Frison; Annelie Thuresson; Susanne Johansson; Maria Eriksson-Lepkowska; Marita Larsson; Ulf G Eriksson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.