Literature DB >> 15586286

Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the rat eye: effects of cholinergic and anticholinergic agents.

Nicholas Nissirios1, Jerome Ramos-Esteban, John Danias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past few years the rat has gained prominence as an animal model for the study of glaucoma. However, no systematic study of the angle structures and the effects of medications on angle anatomy in the rat has been reported to date. We investigated the normal rat anterior segment anatomy in vivo using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and determined the effect of both cholinergic and anticholinergic medications on angle structures.
METHODS: Fourteen eyes of seven 2-month-old female Wistar rats were imaged using an ultrasound biomicroscope and a modified eyecup. Baseline measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), iris thickness at the thickest point near the pupillary margin (IT), angle-opening distance (AOD) (distance between the posterior corneal surface and anterior iris surface measured at 200 microm from the scleral spur), corneal thickness (CT) and irido-zonular distance (IZD) were obtained. Imaging was repeated 30 min after instillation of one drop of cyclopentolate 1% and 48 h later 30 min after pilocarpine 1% instillation. The same measurements were obtained and compared to baseline values.
RESULTS: Baseline values for all parameters recorded were not significantly different among contralateral eyes. After instillation of either pilocarpine or cyclopentolate, ACD was the only parameter that did not change significantly from baseline. In contrast, TIA, AOD, IZD, and IT were significantly different among the three groups. Post-hoc analysis (Bonferroni test) revealed differences among all three groups of eyes for TIA and AOD. A difference was also found between the pilocarpine-treated group and the other two groups for IZD and IT. A very small difference detected between the pilocarpine-treated group and the baseline measurements for CT was caused by the zero variance of measurements in the former group. Although both pilocarpine and cyclopentolate induced angle narrowing, inspection of the ultrasonic images revealed a differential effect. Pilocarpine caused a "pupillary block-like" picture, while cyclopentolate caused crowding of the iris base in the angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics of the normal rat anterior chamber anatomy were established. Both cyclopentolate and pilocarpine cause angle narrowing in the rat eye, by different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586286     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1061-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  Iris configuration in accommodation in pigment dispersion syndrome.

Authors:  M O Balidis; C Bunce; C J Sandy; R P L Wormald; M H Miller
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Programmed cell death of retinal ganglion cells during experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  E Garcia-Valenzuela; S Shareef; J Walsh; S C Sharma
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  A rat model of chronic pressure-induced optic nerve damage.

Authors:  J C Morrison; C G Moore; L M Deppmeier; B G Gold; C K Meshul; E C Johnson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Electroretinographic abnormalities in a rat glaucoma model with chronic elevated intraocular pressure.

Authors:  A U Bayer; J Danias; S Brodie; K P Maag; B Chen; F Shen; S M Podos; T W Mittag
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  The management of glaucoma in nanophthalmos.

Authors:  F P Calhoun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1975

6.  In vivo pachymetry in normal eyes of rats, mice and rabbits with the optical low coherence reflectometer.

Authors:  Dominic Schulz; Milko E Iliev; Beatrice E Frueh; David Goldblum
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Experimental glaucoma model in the rat induced by laser trabecular photocoagulation after an intracameral injection of India ink.

Authors:  J Ueda; S Sawaguchi; T Hanyu; K Yaoeda; T Fukuchi; H Abe; H Ozawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Accommodation and iridotomy in the pigment dispersion syndrome.

Authors:  C J Pavlin; P Macken; G E Trope; K Harasiewicz; F S Foster
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1996-02

9.  Prevention of blinking alters iris configuration in pigment dispersion syndrome and in normal eyes.

Authors:  J M Liebmann; C Tello; S J Chew; H Cohen; R Ritch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  An ultrasound biomicroscopic dark-room provocative test.

Authors:  C J Pavlin; K Harasiewicz; F S Foster
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the anterior ocular segment measurements using swept-source optical coherent tomography and a scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer.

Authors:  Toshie Furuya; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Tatsuya Chiba; Satoshi Kogure; Shigeo Tsukahara; Kenji Kashiwagi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Comparison of anterior segment structures in two rat glaucoma models: an ultrasound biomicroscopic study.

Authors:  Nikolaos Nissirios; Raul Chanis; Elaine Johnson; John Morrison; William O Cepurna; Lijun Jia; Thomas Mittag; John Danias
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  In vivo imaging of the rodent eye with swept source/Fourier domain OCT.

Authors:  Jonathan J Liu; Ireneusz Grulkowski; Martin F Kraus; Benjamin Potsaid; Chen D Lu; Bernhard Baumann; Jay S Duker; Joachim Hornegger; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy in small animal research: applications in molecular and preclinical imaging.

Authors:  A Greco; M Mancini; S Gargiulo; M Gramanzini; P P Claudio; A Brunetti; M Salvatore
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.