| Literature DB >> 15585842 |
Douglas C Palmer1, Sanjeeve Balasubramaniam, Ken-Ichi Hanada, Claudia Wrzesinski, Zhiya Yu, Shahram Farid, Marc R Theoret, Leroy N Hwang, Christopher A Klebanoff, Luca Gattinoni, Allan L Goldstein, James C Yang, Nicholas P Restifo.
Abstract
It has been suggested that antitumor T cells specifically traffic to the tumor site, where they effect tumor destruction. To test whether tumor-reactive CD8(+) T cells specifically home to tumor, we assessed the trafficking of gp100-specific pmel-1 cells to large, vascularized tumors that express or do not express the target Ag. Activation of tumor-specific CD8(+) pmel-1 T cells with IL-2 and vaccination with an altered peptide ligand caused regression of gp100-positive tumors (B16), but not gp100-negative tumors (methylcholanthrene 205), implanted on opposing flanks of the same mouse. Surprisingly, we found approximately equal and very large numbers of pmel-1 T cells (>25% of all lymphocytes) infiltrating both Ag-positive and Ag-negative tumors. We also found evidence of massive infiltration and proliferation of activated antitumor pmel-1 cells in a variety of peripheral tissues, including lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and lungs, but not peripheral blood. Most importantly, evidence for T cell function, as measured by production of IFN-gamma, release of perforin, and activation of caspase-3 in target cells, was confined to Ag-expressing tumor. We thus conclude that CD8(+) T cell-mediated destruction of tumor is the result of specific T cell triggering at the tumor site. The ability to induce ubiquitous homing and specific tumor destruction may be important in the case of noninflammatory metastatic tumor foci.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15585842 PMCID: PMC2241746 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.12.7209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol ISSN: 0022-1767 Impact factor: 5.422