Literature DB >> 15585392

Preoperative serum albumin level is a prognostic indicator for adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia.

Yung-Chang Lien1, Chih-Cheng Hsieh, Yu-Chung Wu, Han-Shui Hsu, Wen-Hu Hsu, Liang-Shun Wang, Min-Hsiung Huang, Biing-Shiun Huang.   

Abstract

Among patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia, we noted that patients with higher preoperative serum albumin levels appeared to survive longer than patients with lower levels. Thus, we evaluated serum albumin as a prognostic factor for patient survival. From 1987 to 1997, 314 patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia underwent curative resection. Patient serum albumin levels were evaluated on the second day after admission, before any nutritional support. Patients were divided into two groups: those with normal serum albumin levels (>3.5 g/dl) and those with abnormal serum albumin levels. The perioperative mortality and morbidity were 5.7% (18 of 314) and 22.3% (70 of 314), respectively. The surgical resectability rate was significantly better among patients with normal serum albumin levels (P < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with normal serum albumin levels was also better than those with abnormally low serum albumin levels (38.4% versus 19.1%, P=0.0003). In each cancer stage, the 5-year survival rate of patients with normal serum albumin levels was better than that among those with hypoalbuminemia. By multivariate analysis, serum albumin level and the pathologic T, N statuses were independent factors correlated with prognosis. Preoperative serum albumin level correlated highly with resectability and survival. Patients with abnormal serum albumin levels had worse survival than did those with normal serum albumin levels. We recommend that postoperative adjuvant therapy be given to all patients with hypoalbuminemia preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15585392     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  21 in total

1.  Adenocarcinoma of distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: long-term results of surgical treatment in a North Indian Center.

Authors:  R Parshad; R K Singh; A Kumar; S D Gupta; T K Chattopadhyay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prediction of operative morbidity and mortality by preoperative nutritional assessment.

Authors:  J L Mullen; G P Buzby; M T Waldman; M H Gertner; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1979

3.  Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  G P Buzby; J L Mullen; D C Matthews; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: pathologic stage analysis and multivariate regression analysis.

Authors:  Y Kajiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; K Tsutsumi; Y Kinoshita; M Ueno; H Akiyama
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Results of surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia.

Authors:  Giovanni de Manzoni; Corrado Pedrazzani; Felice Pasini; Alberto Di Leo; Emilia Durante; Gabriele Castaldini; Claudio Cordiano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.

Authors:  F H Ellis; G J Heatley; M J Krasna; W A Williamson; K Balogh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Implications of malnutrition in the surgical patient.

Authors:  J L Mullen; M H Gertner; G P Buzby; G L Goodhart; E F Rosato
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1979-02

8.  Recurrence and survival after resection of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  L P Stassen; F T Bosman; P D Siersema; W C Hop; J G Blomjous; H W Tilanus
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

Authors:  R J Jakl; J Miholic; R Koller; E Markis; E Wolner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Long-term survival in relation to the pattern of lymph node metastasis and a critical analysis of the accuracy or inaccuracy of pTNM classification.

Authors:  W H Steup; P De Leyn; G Deneffe; D Van Raemdonck; W Coosemans; T Lerut
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  62 in total

1.  Impact of being underweight on the long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Tomohiro Kunishige; Hiroshi Nakade; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kai-Yu Sun; Jian-Bo Xu; Shu-Ling Chen; Yu-Jie Yuan; Hui Wu; Jian-Jun Peng; Chuang-Qi Chen; Pi Guo; Yuan-Tao Hao; Yu-Long He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Preoperative serum albumin is an independent prognostic predictor of survival in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  V Asher; J Lee; A Bali
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Patterns of care and outcomes of older versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A Fox Chase Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Namrata Vijayvergia; Efrat Dotan; Karthik Devarajan; Kamel Hatahet; Farah Rahman; Julianna Ricco; Bianca Lewis; Sameer Gupta; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity after esophagectomy: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) can be a useful indicator to determine prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tadahiro Nozoe; Rumi Matono; Hideki Ijichi; Takefumi Ohga; Takahiro Ezaki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

8.  Usefulness of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio measured preoperatively as a predictor of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakayama; Naoto Gotohda; Hidehito Shibasaki; Shogo Nomura; Takahiro Kinoshita; Ryuichi Hayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Outcome predictors for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who undergo gastrectomy and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshinori Fujiwara; Shuichi Fukuda; Masanori Tsujie; Kotaro Kitani; Keisuke Inoue; Tomonori Hayashi; Hajime Ishikawa; Masao Yukawa; Masatoshi Inoue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is superior to ECOG PS as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding.

Authors:  Shu-Qiang Yuan; Run-Cong Nie; Yong-Ming Chen; Hai-Bo Qiu; Xiao-Ping Li; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Li-Pu Xu; Li-Fang Yang; Xiao-Wei Sun; Yuan-Fang Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.