Literature DB >> 15585028

Heat sensitivity of a SARS-associated coronavirus introduced into plasma products.

M Yunoki1, T Urayama, I Yamamoto, S Abe, K Ikuta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Various measures to inactivate/remove viruses have been implemented for manufacturing plasma-derived products. Here, we examined the heat inactivation ability of an agent of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), SARS coronavirus (CoV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Frankfurt-1 strain of SARS-CoV was incorporated in manufacturing processes of several products by using samples collected immediately before liquid heat treatment at 60 degrees C.
RESULTS: SARS-CoV was easily inactivated by this treatment for 60 min in all in-process samples. However, the different composition of the tested samples affected the heat sensitivity of the virus strain: the infectivity of the virus in Antithrombin III preparation still remained after heating for 30 min at 60 degrees C.
CONCLUSION: If by rare chance SARS-CoV contaminates source plasma, there should be no or only minor risk of this virus infection, due to sufficient inactivation by the 60 degrees C 10 h liquid heating step, although we must pay attention to the composition used for blood product preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15585028      PMCID: PMC7169306          DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00577.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


Introduction

Various measures are available to inactivate or remove viruses during the manufacture of plasma‐derived products. In the present study we evaluated the ability of liquid heat treatment to inactivate a coronavirus (CoV) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The virus was introduced into several products during their manufacture and processing, immediately before liquid heat treatment at 60 °C.

Materials and methods

We used Vero E6 cells, cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, for propagation of the Frankfurt‐1 strain of SARSCoV [1]. The Frankfurt‐1 strain of SARSCoV was kindly provided by Dr John Ziebuhr (University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany), through Dr Fumihiro Taguchi (National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan). For the infectivity assay, Vero E6 cells were seeded in a 96‐well microplate (4 × 105 cells/ml, 0·1 ml/well) and, after overnight culture at 37 °C in 5% CO2/air, the cells were inoculated with serial 10‐fold dilutions of the virus stock solution (0·1 ml/well, five wells per dilution). On day 3 of culture, virus infectivity [the tissue culture infectivity dose 50% (TCID50/ml), log10] was calculated by using Karber's method [2]. The four products tested (all supplied by the Benesis Corporation, Osaka, Japan) were: A heat‐treated/polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐treated intravenous immunoglobulin preparation (Kenketsu Venoglobulin®‐IH). An anti‐thrombin III preparation (Neuart®). A haptoglobin preparation (Haptoglobin Injection‐Yoshitomi). A 25% human serum albumin preparation (Kenketsu Albumin‐Wf). In‐process samples of the plasma‐derived products used in the study were collected immediately before the 10‐h liquid heat treatment at 60 °C that is used in the manufacture. The samples were inoculated with SARSCoV, followed by heat treatment in liquid at 60 °C for 0·5–2 h, after which the remaining infectivity was titrated as described above.

Results and discussion

In all four in‐process samples, Frankfurt‐1 was rapidly inactivated to below the detection limit within 60 min. However, its infectivity in the anti‐thrombin III preparation persisted, despite heating for 30 min at 60 °C, although the same amount of heating inactivated the virus in the other three preparations (Fig. 1). This result was confirmed by an independent experiment (data not shown). Furthermore, when Frankfurt‐1 was inoculated into the solutions containing the stabilizer alone (without protein), 30 min of heating inactivated the virus to below the detection limit in all four products (data not shown), suggesting that the combination of the blood product preparation and its stabilizer affected the heat sensitivity of the virus. Rabenau and his colleagues also conducted experiments using the SARSCoV FFM‐1 strain. As in our study, they found that while the virus was stabilized by heating at 56 °C for 30 min in the presence of 20% FBS, it was inactivated at 60 °C in the presence and absence of 20% FBS [3]. In this context therefore we must take into consideration the combination of the plasma products and the stabilizer.
Figure 1

Inactivation kinetics of a SARS‐associated coronavirus (SARS‐CoV). The Frankfurt‐1 strain was inoculated, at either 10% (v/v, solid line) or 1% (v/v, broken line), into in‐process solutions of a heat‐treated/polyethylene glycol‐treated intravenous immunoglobulin preparation (◆), an anti‐thrombin III preparation (▴), a haptoglobin preparation (▪), and a 25% human serum albumin preparation (•), each collected immediately before liquid heat treatment. The virus in these products was then treated at 60 °C for up to 2 h. The virus was also inoculated (10% v/v) into minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and then heat treated as a control (x). The data shown represent the virus infectivities remaining after heat treatment.

Inactivation kinetics of a SARS‐associated coronavirus (SARSCoV). The Frankfurt‐1 strain was inoculated, at either 10% (v/v, solid line) or 1% (v/v, broken line), into in‐process solutions of a heat‐treated/polyethylene glycol‐treated intravenous immunoglobulin preparation (◆), an anti‐thrombin III preparation (▴), a haptoglobin preparation (▪), and a 25% human serum albumin preparation (•), each collected immediately before liquid heat treatment. The virus in these products was then treated at 60 °C for up to 2 h. The virus was also inoculated (10% v/v) into minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and then heat treated as a control (x). The data shown represent the virus infectivities remaining after heat treatment.
  2 in total

1.  Multiple enzymatic activities associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus helicase.

Authors:  Konstantin A Ivanov; Volker Thiel; Jessika C Dobbe; Yvonne van der Meer; Eric J Snijder; John Ziebuhr
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Stability and inactivation of SARS coronavirus.

Authors:  H F Rabenau; J Cinatl; B Morgenstern; G Bauer; W Preiser; H W Doerr
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.402

  2 in total
  19 in total

1.  Holder pasteurization of donated human milk is effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Sharon Unger; Natasha Christie-Holmes; Furkan Guvenc; Patrick Budylowski; Samira Mubareka; Scott D Gray-Owen; Deborah L O'Connor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2. 

Authors:  Sharon Unger; Natasha Christie-Holmes; Furkan Guvenc; Patrick Budylowski; Samira Mubareka; Scott D Gray-Owen; Deborah L O'Connor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Heat inactivation of serum interferes with the immunoanalysis of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Xiumei Hu; Taixue An; Bo Situ; Yuhai Hu; Zihao Ou; Qiang Li; Xiaojing He; Ye Zhang; Peifu Tian; Dehua Sun; Yongyu Rui; Qian Wang; Dan Ding; Lei Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Sensitivity in Detection of Antibodies to Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Peter D Burbelo; Francis X Riedo; Chihiro Morishima; Stephen Rawlings; Davey Smith; Sanchita Das; Jeffrey R Strich; Daniel S Chertow; Richard T Davey; Jeffrey I Cohen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Proposal for the return to routine endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sunil Gupta; Neal Shahidi; Nicole Gilroy; Douglas K Rex; Nicholas G Burgess; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Selection of parameters for thermal coronavirus inactivation - a data-based recommendation.

Authors:  Martin Hessling; Katharina Hoenes; Christian Lingenfelder
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2020-07-13

7.  Detection of Nucleocapsid Antibody to SARS-CoV-2 is More Sensitive than Antibody to Spike Protein in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Peter D Burbelo; Francis X Riedo; Chihiro Morishima; Stephen Rawlings; Davey Smith; Sanchita Das; Jeffrey R Strich; Daniel S Chertow; Richard T Davey; Jeffrey I Cohen
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 8.  Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19: State of the Art.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Arthur O Anderson; Julian W Tang; Marco Tuccori
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Modern plasma fractionation.

Authors:  Thierry Burnouf
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2007-04

10.  Temperature Decreases Spread Parameters of the New Covid-19 Case Dynamics.

Authors:  Jacques Demongeot; Yannis Flet-Berliac; Hervé Seligmann
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.