Literature DB >> 1558500

Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. A prospective, controlled study.

T M Tsang1, P K Tam, H Saing.   

Abstract

In a 3-year period, 63 consecutive patients with advanced perforated (n=53) and gangrenous (n=10) appendicitis were allocated to undergo either immediate wound closure or delayed primary wound closure after emergency appendectomy. The incidence of wound infection between delayed primary wound closure and immediate wound closure was similar (24.0% and 21.1%, respectively). The duration for complete healing of infected wounds was slightly shorter in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 24.3 +/- 9.2 days) than in the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 32.6 +/- 16.5 days), but the difference was not significant. However, healing of noninfected wounds was significantly prolonged in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 19.3 +/- 10.1 days) compared with the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 7.0 +/- 0 days). The latter had been shown to associate with more nonseptic wound complications and therefore required longer rehabilitation. Our study showed that delayed primary closure did not offer additional advantage over immediate closure in the treatment of wounds associated with advanced appendicitis in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1558500     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420040097017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  7 in total

Review 1.  Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marion C W Henry; R Lawrence Moss
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds.

Authors:  S M Cohn; G Giannotti; A W Ong; J E Varela; D V Shatz; M G McKenney; D Sleeman; E Ginzburg; J S Augenstein; P M Byers; L R Sands; M D Hellinger; N Namias
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A randomized trial analyzing the effects of primary versus delayed primary closure of incision on wound healing in patients with hollow viscus perforation.

Authors:  Aditya Baksi; Shamita Chatterjee; Udipta Ray; Nilima Nilima; Washim Firoz Khan; Niladri Banerjee
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 4.  Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Simon Eaton; Winnie W Y Chan; Cheri Nickel; Agostino Pierro; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Outcome of primary closure of abdominal wounds following laparotomy for peritonitis in children.

Authors:  Stephen Akau Kache; Philip M Mshelbwala; Emmanuel A Ameh
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Efficacy of delayed primary closure with intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment after surgery for colorectal perforation.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ogawa; Hidetoshi Nitta; Toshiro Masuda; Katsutaka Matsumoto; Tetsuya Okino; Yuji Miyamoto; Hideo Baba; Hiroshi Takamori
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds.

Authors:  Boonying Siribumrungwong; Pinit Noorit; Chumpon Wilasrusmee; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.