Literature DB >> 15584846

Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.

Ryann M Haw1, Ronald P Fisher.   

Abstract

Concern that lineup administrators can influence eyewitness identifications has led researchers to suggest implementing double-blind testing, an idea that police resist. Using a typical eyewitness paradigm (video event followed by photographic identification test), the present study demonstrated that an alternative technique, minimizing the level of contact between lineup administrators and witnesses, could reduce false identifications without reducing hits. Specifically, witnesses were more likely to make decisions consistent with lineup administrator expectations when the level of contact between the administrator and the witness was high than when it was low. These results are explained within the experimenter expectancy framework. Implications for applied settings are discussed. 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15584846     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  4 in total

Review 1.  Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Ryan D Godfrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Bradley D McAuliff; Brian H Bornstein
Journal:  Psychol Crime Law       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Molly B Moreland; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

4.  The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.

Authors:  D P Morgan; J Tamminen; T M Seale-Carlisle; L Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.