Literature DB >> 15582250

Deletions of chromosomes 9 and 8p in histologically normal urothelium of patients with bladder cancer.

Robert Stoehr1, Sabrina Zietz, Maximilian Burger, Thomas Filbeck, Stefan Denzinger, Ellen C Obermann, Christine Hammerschmied, Wolf F Wieland, Ruth Knuechel, Arndt Hartmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Multifocality and frequent recurrence of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder indicate a disease of the entire "urothelial field", but little is known about chromosomal alterations in histologically normal urothelium. Histopathologically normal urothelium from patients with and without concurrent urothelial carcinoma was analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosomes 8p, 9 and 17p, regions that are known to play an important role in urothelial carcinogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histologically inconspicuous urothelial mucosa samples (n = 160) from cystectomy specimens of patients with urothelial carcinoma (n = 15, max. diagnosis: CIS, pT1-4; all tumors grade 3) were studied. Control samples (n = 50) were obtained from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 30) and from cystectomies performed for invasive non-urothelial carcinoma (n = 20). Tissue samples were laser-microdissected and DNA was isolated using standard protocols. LOH analyses were performed using 16 polymorphic markers on chromosomes 8p, 9p/q and 17p.
RESULTS: All investigated samples were informative for at least one microsatellite marker on each chromosome/chromosomal arm. Deletions were found on chromosome 9 and/or 8p in 15/160 (9.4%) of normal urothelial samples from urothelial cancer patients. These alterations were only found in 5/15 patients with urothelial carcinoma. There were no deletions on chromosome 17p. The marker D9S1113 on chromosome 9q33-34 was most frequently affected (11/15 samples, 73%). No chromosomal deletions were found in any of the 50 urothelial control samples.
CONCLUSION: Specific genetic alterations frequently associated with bladder cancer are detectable in histologically normal urothelium of patients with bladder cancer, supporting the field effect hypothesis in urothelial carcinogenesis. However, intramucosal spread of tumor cells that escape light microscopic detection remains a possibility, since normal urothelium and concurrent carcinomas showed matching deletions. Chromosomal deletions in normal bladder mucosa are not a common finding and argue against a frequent genomic alteration of the entire urothelial field in bladder carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582250     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  False-positive lesions detected by fluorescence cystoscopy: any association with p53 and p16 expression?

Authors:  K Hendricksen; P M J Moonen; A G der Heijden; J A Witjes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Interdisciplinary networking for clinical and molecular questions in non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].

Authors:  S Denzinger; A Hartmann; F Hofstaedter; R Knuechel; P J Wild; D Zaak; C Stief; W F Wieland; R Stoehr; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The route to personalized medicine in bladder cancer: where do we stand?

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Chiara Ciccarese; Matteo Santoni; Matteo Brunelli; Alessandro Conti; Alessandra Modena; Rodolfo Montironi; Daniele Santini; Liang Cheng; Guido Martignoni; Stefano Cascinu; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.493

4.  Elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides (EMAST) and mismatch repair gene expression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; Stefan Denzinger; Christine G Hammerschmied; Andrea Tannapfel; Ellen C Obermann; Wolf F Wieland; Arndt Hartmann; Robert Stoehr
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Gene expression profile of cervical tissue compared to exfoliated cells: impact on biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Martin Steinau; Daisy R Lee; Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Suzanne D Vernon; Mack T Ruffin; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Frequency of activating mutations in FGFR2 exon 7 in bladder tumors from patients with early-onset and regular-onset disease.

Authors:  Christine Spiegelberg; Johannes Giedl; Nadine T Gaisa; Anja Rogler; Marc-Oliver Riener; Thomas Filbeck; Maximilian Burger; Petra Ruemmele; Arndt Hartmann; Robert Stoehr
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

7.  [Precancerous lesions of the urothelium. From Feulgen staining to single cell CGH].

Authors:  R Knüchel; S V Koufou; M Speicher; K Schwamborn; D Zaak; R Stöhr
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Variant morphology and random chromosomal integration of BK polyomavirus in posttransplant urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Simone Bertz; Armin Ensser; Robert Stoehr; Markus Eckstein; Hendrik Apel; Doris Mayr; Maike Buettner-Herold; Nadine Therese Gaisa; Eva Compérat; Bernd Wullich; Arndt Hartmann; Antje Knöll
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Are keratoacanthomas variants of squamous cell carcinomas? A comparison of chromosomal aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ole Petter F Clausen; Hans Christian D Aass; Marzieh Beigi; Karin J Purdie; Charlotte M Proby; Victoria L Brown; Morten Mattingsdal; Francesca Micci; Steen Kølvraa; Lars Bolund; Paula M Deangelis
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Molecular markers in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: New insights into mechanisms and prognosis.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.