Literature DB >> 15581525

Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion.

Kathleen P Tebb1, Maarit H Paukku, Meaghan R Pai-Dhungat, Afua-Adoma Gyamfi, Mary-Ann B Shafer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess sexually active adolescent females' attitudes of home tests for sexually transmitted infections.
METHODS: This study represents a follow-up to a study on adolescent attitudes toward different sampling methods for STI testing. In the initial study participants completed a pre-examination health survey, provided first void urine (FVU) and self-collected vaginal swab samples followed by a pelvic examination with STI screening by endocervical swabs. Participants' attitudes about the three collection techniques were assessed at the end of the visit. For the current study, this same group of ethnically diverse adolescents (13-20-years-old) was contacted by telephone 9 months after their initial clinic visit to re-assess their attitudes about the three specimen collection techniques and to evaluate their attitudes regarding the use of home STI testing. Friedman tests of mean ranks evaluated teens' rankings of STI sampling methods and multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of home test preference.
RESULTS: Home urine testing was the first choice for STI screening followed by the FVU, self-obtained vaginal swab and endocervical swab collected in a clinical setting. FVU was preferred to self-collected vaginal swabs (p = .01). Adolescents who worried about having an STI were more likely to favor home urine testing (OR 5.5, p = .01). Only 22% would seek any STI screening if asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Because young women preferred home STI testing, this may be an additional option, as the foundation for such testing kits has progressed. Adolescent preferences may be heavily influenced by the pelvic examination experience. Because of the largely asymptomatic nature of CT infections, multiple screening options (clinical and home-based) need to be available to increase access to care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15581525     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  9 in total

1.  Vouchers versus Lotteries: What works best in promoting Chlamydia screening? A cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Claudia Niza; Caroline Rudisill; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Appl Econ Perspect Policy       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.083

2.  Accuracy and trust of self-testing for bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Marianne Claire Bernard; Justin R Bates; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Acceptability of self-testing for trichomoniasis increases with experience.

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Molly A Bernard; Yang Xiao; Bin Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Martine H P Ickenroth; Gaby Ronda; Janaica E J Grispen; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Factors promoting and impeding HIV testing among adolescents in juvenile drug court.

Authors:  Rebecca L Fix; Elizabeth J Letourneau; Pia M Mauro; Michael R McCart; Ashli J Sheidow
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2018-11-15

6.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.

Authors:  Priyamvada Paudyal; Carrie Llewellyn; Jason Lau; Mohammad Mahmud; Helen Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Polymerase Chain Reaction as a Diagnostic Tool for Six Sexually Transmitted Infections - Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Alecsandra Iulia Grad; Mihaela Laura Vica; Horea Vladi Matei; Doru Lucian Grad; Ioan Coman; Dumitru Alexandru Tataru
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-01-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.