Literature DB >> 15580479

Risk of fracture among women who lose bone density during treatment with alendronate. The Fracture Intervention Trial.

R D Chapurlat1, L Palermo, P Ramsay, S R Cummings.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that the response to treatment in patients on alendronate is proportional to the increase in bone mineral density (BMD), and that those who lose BMD during treatment might not respond to treatment. In the Fracture Intervention Trial 6,459 women were randomly assigned to treatment with alendronate or placebo; BMD was measured annually, and new spine fractures were assessed by lateral spine films, taken at baseline and end of follow-up. Among subjects who took at least 70% of the study drug (5,220 women), we compared reductions in risk of spine fractures at end of follow-up (3 or 4 years) within various levels of change in total hip and spine BMD after 1 and 2 years of treatment, after adjustment for differences in characteristics between the treatment and control groups. Women "losing" BMD at the lumbar spine (0% to 4%) while on alendronate had a reduction of 60% in vertebral fracture risk [OR = 0.40 (0.16, 0.99)] compared to their counterparts in the placebo group. The few women that lost more than 4% did not have a significant benefit [OR = 0.15 (0.02, 1.29)]. Those who "gained" BMD (0% to 4%) during treatment had a reduction in risk of 51% [OR = 0.49 (0.30, 0.78)]. Similarly, women who "lost" total hip BMD (0% to 4%) during the first year on alendronate had a 53% decreased risk of vertebral fracture compared to their controls taking placebo [OR = 0.47 (0.27, 0.81)], whereas those "gaining" BMD (0% to 4%) had a comparable risk reduction [OR = 0.49 (0.34, 0.71)]. This was not observed for the few women who lost more than 4% [OR = 0.61 (0.11, 3.45)]. Patients who lost BMD at both the hip and spine were not protected by alendronate. Among patients who adhere to treatment with alendronate, even those who lose BMD benefit from a substantial reduction in risk of vertebral fracture. So, the reduction in bone turnover induced by alendronate might be more important than BMD changes. The few women who lose the most BMD (more than 4% per year) might not benefit from the treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580479     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1770-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  14 in total

1.  How does antiresorptive therapy decrease the risk of fracture in women with osteoporosis?

Authors:  P D Delmas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-01-26       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Larger increases in bone mineral density during alendronate therapy are associated with a lower risk of new vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  M C Hochberg; P D Ross; D Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; E Barrett-Connor; T Musliner; D Thompson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-06

4.  Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; L Palermo; W Browner; R Marcus; R Wallace; J Pearson; T Blackwell; S Eckert; D Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  D M Black; T F Reiss; M C Nevitt; J Cauley; D Karpf; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.

Authors:  U A Liberman; S R Weiss; J Bröll; H W Minne; H Quan; N H Bell; J Rodriguez-Portales; R W Downs; J Dequeker; M Favus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Architecture and vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R R Recker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Vertebral structure and strength in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  L Mosekilde
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Assessing vertebral fractures. National Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group on Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  D Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effect of oral monthly ibandronate on bone microarchitecture in women with osteopenia-a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; M Laroche; T Thomas; S Rouanet; P D Delmas; M-C de Vernejoul
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Successes achieved and challenges ahead in translating biomarkers into clinical applications.

Authors:  Greg Tesch; Shashi Amur; John T Schousboe; Jeffrey N Siegel; Lawrence J Lesko; Jane P F Bai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Bone mineral density testing: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; G Michael Allan; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Incidence and Predictors of Repeat Bone Mineral Densitometry: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily C White VanGompel; Peter Franks; John A Robbins; Joshua J Fenton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Clinical use of bone turnover markers to monitor pharmacologic fracture prevention therapy.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Measuring bone quality.

Authors:  Elisa Torres-del-Pliego; Laia Vilaplana; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Adolfo Diez-Pérez
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

8.  To stop or not to stop, that is the question.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover: potential use in the investigation and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Szulc; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M M Wilkes; R J Navickis; W W Chan; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.