Literature DB >> 15579882

Do deaf children use phonological syllables as reading units?

C Transler1, J Leybaert, J Gombert.   

Abstract

This study aimed at examining whether deaf children process written words on the basis of phonological units. In French, the syllable is a phonologically and orthographically well-defined unit. French deaf children and hearing children matched on word recognition level were asked to copy written words and pseudo-words. The number of glances at the item, copying duration, and the locus of the first segmentation (i.e., after the first glance) within the item were measured. The main question was whether the segments copied by the deaf children corresponded to syllables as defined by phonological and orthographic rules.The results showed that deaf children, like hearing children, used syllables as copying units when the syllable boundaries were marked both by orthographic and phonological criteria. However, in a condition in which orthographic and phonological criteria were differentiated, the deaf children did not perform phonological segmentations while the hearing children did. We discuss two explanatory hypotheses. First, items in this condition were difficult to decode for deaf children; second, orthographic units were probably easier to process for deaf children than phonological units because of a lack of automaticity in their phonological conversion processes for pseudo-words. Finally, incidental observations during the experimental task raised the question of the use of fingerspelled units.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15579882     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/4.2.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  7 in total

1.  Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Alex A del Giudice; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-11-11

2.  Phonological Awareness at 5 years of age in Children who use Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Linda Cupples
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Child       Date:  2015-09

3.  Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Rachel I Mayberry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The effect of sign language structure on complex word reading in Chinese deaf adolescents.

Authors:  Aitao Lu; Yanping Yu; Jiaxin Niu; John X Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Interaction between Central and Peripheral Processing in Chinese Handwritten Production: Evidence from the Effect of Lexicality and Radical Complexity.

Authors:  Qingfang Zhang; Chen Feng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-13

6.  Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish.

Authors:  Brendan Costello; Sendy Caffarra; Noemi Fariña; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sign language ability in young deaf signers predicts comprehension of written sentences in English.

Authors:  Kathy N Andrew; Jennifer Hoshooley; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.