Literature DB >> 15579760

Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial.

G Schernthaner1, D R Matthews, B Charbonnel, M Hanefeld, P Brunetti.   

Abstract

Pioglitazone increases the insulin sensitivity of peripheral tissues and may provide an alternative first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes. This study compared metabolic control in drug-naive type 2 diabetes patients given either pioglitazone or metformin. Eleven hundred and ninety-nine patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), 7.5-11%; normal, 4.3-6.1%] were randomized to receive either pioglitazone (< or =45 mg/d) or metformin (< or =850 mg, three times daily). HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin levels, total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids, and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio were measured. Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups from baseline to wk 52 (-1.4% and -1.5%). Significantly greater mean reductions in FPG were observed in the pioglitazone group (-45.0 mg/dl; -2.5 mmol/liter) than in the metformin (-39.6 mg/dl; -2.2 mmol/liter) group (P = 0.016). Favorable changes in triglycerides and HDL-C were more pronounced with pioglitazone. Although low density lipoprotein cholesterol and TC levels increased with pioglitazone, TC/HDL-C ratios decreased similarly with both treatments. The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was reduced by 19% with pioglitazone treatment, but remained unchanged with metformin therapy (-1%; P = 0.002). There was an increase in body weight of 1.9 kg in the pioglitazone group and a decrease of 2.5 kg in the metformin group. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups, but adverse event profiles were different between treatment groups. HbA1c reduction is similar after pioglitazone and metformin monotherapies, but differences in FPG, plasma lipids, and adverse effects between the two compounds may influence decision-making in individual prescribers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579760     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  72 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic modalities in diabetic nephropathy: standard and emerging approaches.

Authors:  Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Lawand Saadulla; W Brian Reeves; Alaa S Awad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John Waugh; Gillian M Keating; Greg L Plosker; Stephanie Easthope; Dean M Robinson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  A mechanism-based disease progression model for comparison of long-term effects of pioglitazone, metformin and gliclazide on disease processes underlying Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Willem de Winter; Joost DeJongh; Teun Post; Bart Ploeger; Richard Urquhart; Ian Moules; David Eckland; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  [Diabetic kidney disease - Update 2016].

Authors:  Harald Sourij; Roland Edlinger; Friedrich Prischl; Martin Auinger; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Marcus D Säemann; Rudolf Prager; Martin Clodi; Guntram Schernthaner; Gert Mayer; Rainer Oberbauer; Alexander R Rosenkranz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Is intensive glucose control beneficial or deadly? Lessons from ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS, PROactive, and NICE-SUGAR.

Authors:  Guntram Schernthaner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01

6.  [Current treatment of type 2 diabetes].

Authors:  G Schernthaner; G-H Schernthaner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of oral diabetes medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Shari Bolen; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Crystal Wiley; Lisa M Wilson; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Leonard Feldman; Jason Vassy; Renee Wilson; Eric B Bass; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-27

8.  Is the ADA/EASD algorithm for the management of type 2 diabetes (January 2009) based on evidence or opinion? A critical analysis.

Authors:  G Schernthaner; A H Barnett; D J Betteridge; R Carmena; A Ceriello; B Charbonnel; M Hanefeld; R Lehmann; M T Malecki; R Nesto; V Pirags; A Scheen; J Seufert; A Sjohölm; A Tsatsoulis; R DeFronzo
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Shinji Kume; Takashi Uzu; Keiji Isshiki; Daisuke Koya
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Long-term effects of rosiglitazone on the progressive decline in renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mee Kyoung Kim; Seung-Hyun Ko; Ki-Hyun Baek; Yu-Bae Ahn; Kun-Ho Yoon; Moo-Il Kang; Kwang-Woo Lee; Ki-Ho Song
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.