Literature DB >> 15579334

Biosecurity in 116 Danish fattening swineherds: descriptive results and factor analysis.

A Boklund1, L Alban, S Mortensen, H Houe.   

Abstract

Biosecurity measures are important for the herd's protection against diseases and also to provide nationwide protection against the introduction of exotic diseases. In this paper, we describe the farmers' choices and routines regarding biosecurity in Danish fattening herds. Overall, 116 Danish swine fattening herds in three areas of different pig density were interviewed. Of these herds, 78% purchased weaners from one sow herd only, whereas 10% purchased from >5 sow herds during 1 year. Large herds (>500 finishers) purchased weaners more often than smaller herds (< or =500 finishers). Only two swine producers purchased weaners from a market. Almost all herds (95%) received weaners from one sow herd at one time, and only one herd received from >5 sow herds in one batch. Twenty-one percent did not use an effective barrier between the loading area and the stables when delivering pigs for slaughter. Entry rooms (in which clothing and boots are changed) were common at the farm, and the numbers of visitors were generally low (<10 visitors a year). Factor analysis was performed to find underlying structures of the biosecurity measures in the herd; four factors were chosen (eigenvalue > 3.10). A site scoring high on factor 1 was a large SPF herd, which received weaners from a single source, had biosecurity requirements for the transport vehicles, and had a high level of biosecurity for visitors. A site scoring high on factor 2 was a multi-site farm, which had personnel working on more than one of the sites, only received weaners from one sow herd, had delivering herds placed close to the participating site, and transported animals themselves. A site scoring high on factor 3 was a site which hired commercial transport for slaughter, was situated far from the abattoir and had a high level of biosecurity when loading pigs. A production site scoring high on factor 4 was a large site, which used all-in/all-out management, washed and disinfected between each group, and purchased many weaners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579334     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  16 in total

1.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Associations between biosecurity and outbreaks of canine distemper on Danish mink farms in 2012-2013.

Authors:  Louise Gregers-Jensen; Jens Frederik Agger; Anne Sofie Vedsted Hammer; Lars Andresen; Mariann Chrièl; Emma Hagberg; Mette Kragh Jensen; Mette Sif Hansen; Charlotte Kristiane Hjulsager; Tina Struve
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Sero-prevalence and risk factors associated with African swine fever on pig farms in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Emmanuel Jolaoluwa Awosanya; Babasola Olugasa; Gabriel Ogundipe; Yrjo Tapio Grohn
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Biosecurity level and health management practices in 60 Swedish farrow-to-finish herds.

Authors:  Annette Backhans; Marie Sjölund; Ann Lindberg; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain.

Authors:  Fanny Pandolfi; Sandra A Edwards; Dominiek Maes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  Multivariate analysis of management and biosecurity practices in smallholder pig farms in Madagascar.

Authors:  S Costard; V Porphyre; S Messad; S Rakotondrahanta; H Vidon; F Roger; D U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Introduction of African swine fever into the European Union through illegal importation of pork and pork products.

Authors:  Solenne Costard; Bryony Anne Jones; Beatriz Martínez-López; Lina Mur; Ana de la Torre; Marta Martínez; Fernando Sánchez-Vizcaíno; Jose-Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno; Dirk Udo Pfeiffer; Barbara Wieland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of data mining techniques to investigate disease risk classification as a proxy for compromised biosecurity of cattle herds in Wales.

Authors:  Angel Ortiz-Pelaez; Dirk U Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  Strategies to minimize antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Chang-Ro Lee; Ill Hwan Cho; Byeong Chul Jeong; Sang Hee Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.