Literature DB >> 15578548

Cementless metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: comparison with a matched control group using ceramic-on-polyethylene after a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Henri Migaud1, Alexandre Jobin, Christophe Chantelot, François Giraud, Philippe Laffargue, Antoine Duquennoy.   

Abstract

Thirty-nine cementless hip arthroplasties using metal-on-metal articulation were consecutively implanted in 30 patients less than 50 years of age and compared with a matched control group (by age, diagnosis, Devane activity, and Harris hip scores) of cementless arthroplasties using ceramic-on-polyethylene articulation. The Harris hip score at follow-up (minimum 5 years) for the metal-on-metal was 94.9 (range, 74-100). After the same follow-up, the results of the ceramic-on-polyethylene were significantly worse: 9 osteolyses and 7 surgical revisions related to wear (none in the metal-on-metal). Five-year survival rates were 97% +/-2% for the ceramic-on-polyethylene and 100% for the metal-on-metal. The metal-on-metal may be recommended to prevent wear problems in younger and more active patients; however, a longer follow-up is required to confirm this encouraging data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578548     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  23 in total

1.  Do "premium" joint implants add value?: analysis of high cost joint implants in a community registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Amit Sharma; Penny Tatman; Susan Mehle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Serum ion level after metal-on-metal THA in patients with renal failure.

Authors:  Chang Ich Hur; Taek Rim Yoon; Sang Gwon Cho; Eun Kyoo Song; Jong Keun Seon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.

Authors:  William T Long; Manish Dastane; Michael J Harris; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Authors:  M C M Klotz; S J Breusch; M Hassenpflug; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  The clinical performance of metal-on-metal as an articulation surface in total hip replacement.

Authors:  William T Long
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; Brandon J Erickson; Michael D Hellman; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C Anderson Engh; Steven J MacDonald; Supatra Sritulanondha; Abigail Thompson; Douglas Naudie; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian Holloway; William L Walter; Bernie Zicat; William K Walter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish R Dastane; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.