Literature DB >> 15576390

Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

G De Placido1, C Alviggi, A Perino, I Strina, F Lisi, A Fasolino, R De Palo, A Ranieri, N Colacurci, A Mollo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In approximately 12-14% of young normogonadotrophic women treated with a depot GnRH agonist long protocol, the initial ovarian response to recombinant human FSH (rFSH) can be suboptimal. We have tested the hypothesis that these women may benefit from recombinant human LH (rLH) supplementation in a multicentre, prospective, randomized trial compared with patients treated with an rFSH step-up protocol.
METHODS: A total of 260 young normogonadotrophic women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with a GnRH agonist long protocol for IVF/ICSI were enrolled. The starting dose of rFSH was 225 IU. One hundred and thirty patients with serum estradiol levels <180 pg/ml and with at least six follicles with a mean diameter >5 mm but none >10 mm on both day 5 and day 8 of stimulation were randomly allocated to two groups. From the eighth day of stimulation, women in group A (n=65) received 150 IU of rLH in addition to rFSH, while those in group B (n=65) had an increase of 150 IU in the daily dose of rFSH (step-up protocol). One hundred and thirty normally responding women continued monotherapy with rFSH and served as a further control population (group C).
RESULTS: The mean number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved in group A (9.0+/-4.3) was significantly higher (P<0.01) compared with group B (rFSH 6.1+/-2.6) but significantly lower compared with group C (10.49+/-3.7, P<0.05). Implantation and pregnancy rates were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the rFSH step-up group (10.5 and 29.3% respectively) when compared with normal responders (18.1 and 47.3% respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: rLH supplementation is more effective than increasing the dose of rFSH in terms of ovarian outcome in patients with an initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15576390     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Improved pregnancy rates with luteinizing hormone supplementation in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Authors:  Nicole D Paterson; Shu C Foong; Calvin A Greene
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with proven poor ovarian responsiveness after early vs. mid-follicular LH exposure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiado'; Daniela Guidetti; Francesca Bongioanni; Valentina Rovei; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Lutropin alfa: a viewpoint by Giuseppe De Placido, Roberto Clarizia and Carlo Alviggi.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Placido; Roberto Clarizia; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The effect of rLH supplementation to the GnRH-antagonist protocol on endocrine dynamics in the advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  J S Younis; I Izhaki; M Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Discontinuation of rLH two days before hCG may increase the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF.

Authors:  Jessica B Spencer; Aimee S Browne; Susannah D Copland; Donna R Session
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 6.  Lutropin alfa.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Human choriogonadotropin prior to controlled ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization improves implantation, and pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Eduardo L Motta; Gary D Smith; Paulo C Serafini; Marcio Coslovsky; Pericles Hassun; Andre M Rocha; Isaac Yadid
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 9.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  "hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian stimulation through a long protocol.

Authors:  Panagiotis Beretsos; George A Partsinevelos; Eleni Arabatzi; Peter Drakakis; Depy Mavrogianni; Elli Anagnostou; Kostas Stefanidis; Aris Antsaklis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.