Literature DB >> 15574147

Laparoscopy in the management of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.

Jonathan Koea1, Michael Rodgers, Paul Thompson, John Woodfield, Andrew Holden, John McCall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This investigation was undertaken to define the value of laparoscopy in the staging of patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver.
METHODS: The clinical details of 59 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing laparoscopy prior to planned hepatectomy were entered prospectively on a computerized database. All patients were staged preoperatively with thin slice (5-7 mm) helical computed tomography chest, abdomen and pelvis. Synchronous metastases were defined as those found during, or on imaging carried out within 1 month of, colorectal resection. Criteria for laparoscopic unresectability were: (i) histologically proven extrahepatic disease; (ii) bilateral inflow or outflow involvement; (iii) the presence of cirrhosis in patients requiring an extended resection (lobectomy or greater); or (iv) hepatic metastases involving more than six hepatic segments.
RESULTS: In 24 patients with synchronous metastases (median age 65 years, range 32-81 years) all were resectable on laparoscopic criteria, of whom 21 were resected. Extrahepatic disease was found at laparotomy in three patients. In 35 patients with metachronous metastases (median age 64 years, range 32-81 years) laparoscopy could not be performed in five patients because of adhesions, and three patients were deemed unresectable on laparoscopic criteria. Of the remaining 27 patients, 25 underwent resection while two proved unresectable. Overall eight of 54 evaluable patients had unresectable disease and laparoscopy correctly identified three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Following computed tomography scan, 15% of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma will be found to have unresectable disease. Laparoscopy will identify approximately half. Laparoscopy is of no greater value in staging synchronous versus metachronous metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574147     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

1.  Clinical risk score can be used to select patients for staging laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  A J Shah; J Phull; M D Finch-Jones
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Detection and management of extrahepatic colorectal cancer in patients with resectable liver metastases.

Authors:  Yolanda Y L Yang; James W Fleshman; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic staging in selected patients with colorectal liver metastases as a prelude to liver resection.

Authors:  Sophie A Pilkington; Myrddin Rees; Delia Peppercorn; Timothy G John
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Metachronous liver metastases and resectability: Fong's score and laparoscopic evaluation.

Authors:  G Li Destri; F Di Benedetto; B Torrisi; T R Portale; F Mosca; R Vecchio; A Di Cataldo; S Puleo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Institutional guidelines and ongoing studies in management of liver tumours: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology.

Authors:  R Biffi; F Orsi; M G Zampino; A Chiappa; N Fazio; F De Braud; G Bonomo; L Monfardini; P D Vigna; F Luca; L Bodei; M Bartolomei; G Catalano; M C Leonardi; M Ferrari; B Andreoni; A Goldhirsch; G Paganelli; R Orecchia
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2008-05-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.