A J Shah1, J Phull, M D Finch-Jones. 1. Department of Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India. ashah249@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite advanced staging investigations, some patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are unresectable at laparotomy. Staging laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound (Lap + LUS) detects a subset of these unresectable patients before a major laparotomy. Clinical risk scoring may be helpful to identify this subgroup. The goal of our study was to evaluate the role of Lap + LUS and to assess the value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering clinical risk score (CRS) in identifying this subset. METHODS: Patients were identified from the regional multidisciplinary team (MDT) cancer database and operative records for a 5-year period. All patients whose tumors were deemed resectable proceeded to Lap + LUS. LUS findings were recorded and any change in MDT plan was noted. LUS findings were compared with resectability at open surgery. The CRS (Memorial Sloan-Kettering) based on five factors was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were identified. In 15 of 74 patients, LUS prevented an unnecessary laparotomy by predicting the benign nature of lesions or demonstrating unresectability. The CRS ranged from 0 to 4. Lap + LUS prevented an operation in only 7% of patients with a CRS of < or =2. However in patients with a CRS > 2, Lap + LUS prevented an operation in 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: LUS prevented an unnecessary laparotomy in 20% of patients. This may reduce inpatient stay, morbidity, and mortality, allowing some patients to proceed to palliative treatments earlier. The benefit of Lap + LUS is limited in patients with a CRS of < or =2. It is worth considering selective use of Lap + LUS for the staging of CLM.
BACKGROUND: Despite advanced staging investigations, some patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are unresectable at laparotomy. Staging laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound (Lap + LUS) detects a subset of these unresectable patients before a major laparotomy. Clinical risk scoring may be helpful to identify this subgroup. The goal of our study was to evaluate the role of Lap + LUS and to assess the value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering clinical risk score (CRS) in identifying this subset. METHODS:Patients were identified from the regional multidisciplinary team (MDT) cancer database and operative records for a 5-year period. All patients whose tumors were deemed resectable proceeded to Lap + LUS. LUS findings were recorded and any change in MDT plan was noted. LUS findings were compared with resectability at open surgery. The CRS (Memorial Sloan-Kettering) based on five factors was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were identified. In 15 of 74 patients, LUS prevented an unnecessary laparotomy by predicting the benign nature of lesions or demonstrating unresectability. The CRS ranged from 0 to 4. Lap + LUS prevented an operation in only 7% of patients with a CRS of < or =2. However in patients with a CRS > 2, Lap + LUS prevented an operation in 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: LUS prevented an unnecessary laparotomy in 20% of patients. This may reduce inpatient stay, morbidity, and mortality, allowing some patients to proceed to palliative treatments earlier. The benefit of Lap + LUS is limited in patients with a CRS of < or =2. It is worth considering selective use of Lap + LUS for the staging of CLM.
Authors: Chandrakanth Are; Mithat Gonen; Kathleen Zazzali; Ronald P Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Y Seium; R Stupp; T Ruhstaller; P Gervaz; G Mentha; M Philippe; A Allal; C Trembleau; J Bauer; R Morant; A D Roth Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M D'Angelica; Y Fong; S Weber; M Gonen; R P DeMatteo; K Conlon; L H Blumgart; W R Jarnagin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Timothy M Pawlik; Charles R Scoggins; Daria Zorzi; Eddie K Abdalla; Axel Andres; Cathy Eng; Steven A Curley; Evelyne M Loyer; Andrea Muratore; Gilles Mentha; Lorenzo Capussotti; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: T J M Ruers; B S Langenhoff; N Neeleman; G J Jager; S Strijk; Th Wobbes; F H M Corstens; W J G Oyen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Prabhu Arumugam; Vickna Balarajah; Jennifer Watt; Ajit T Abraham; Satyajit Bhattacharya; Hemant M Kocher Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.375