Literature DB >> 15573742

First-line therapy for ovarian carcinoma: what's next?

Tate Thigpen1.   

Abstract

Based on results from large, randomized trials conducted over the last 25 years, the current standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced (FIGO stage III-IV) ovarian carcinoma is surgical bulk reduction followed by six cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin. This approach has resulted in an enhanced response rate and clinical complete response rate, an improved progression-free survival, an increase in survival, and more long-term survivors. Despite these results, the overall frequency of relapse and hence need for second-line therapy is 62%. Ongoing and future studies focus or will focus on four major themes: dose intensity through the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in selected patients, addition of a third cytotoxic agent to front line therapy, addition of a targeted or biologic agent to front-line therapy, and the development of effective maintenance or consolidation therapy. The current standard of care for patients who present with limited (FIGO stage I-II) ovarian carcinoma is the use of prognostic factors to classify the patient as at low risk or high risk for recurrence. High risk features include: grade 2 or 3 disease, disease on the surface of the ovary, disease outside the ovary, positive peritoneal cytology, or the presence of ascites. Any one high risk feature makes the patient high risk for recurrence. Patients at low risk require surgical resection only, whereas those at high risk for recurrence require adjuvant therapy. Ongoing studies evaluate the duration of therapy and the potential value of anti-angiogenic agents in those patients at high risk for recurrence. Future directions point to the evaluation of targeted or biologic agents in high risk patients. At present, there is no evidence that any approach constitutes an effective screening test. Studies of serum markers, transvaginal sonography, and serum proteomic profiles have failed to establish any of these techniques as an effective tool for early diagnosis. An overview of current management and its basis will be followed by a discussion of the rationale for both current and potential future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573742     DOI: 10.1081/cnv-200030115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic relevance of c-MYC gene amplification and polysomy for chromosome 8 in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Kathleen M Darcy; William E Brady; Jan K Blancato; Robert B Dickson; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Devansu Tewari; James J Java; Ritu Salani; Deborah K Armstrong; Maurie Markman; Thomas Herzog; Bradley J Monk; John K Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ling Mei; Hui Chen; Dong Mei Wei; Fang Fang; Guan J Liu; Huan Yu Xie; Xun Wang; Juan Zou; Xu Han; Dan Feng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-29

4.  Clinical and pathological features of hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  Lina Wang; Yanping Zhong; Lingling Sun; Heng Zhou; Wei Chen; Xiaoxia Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 5.  Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer with Targeted Agents Improves PFS and OS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyu Qian; Jing Qin; Songdan Pan; Xin Li; Yuelong Pan; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prostasin may contribute to chemoresistance, repress cancer cells in ovarian cancer, and is involved in the signaling pathways of CASP/PAK2-p34/actin.

Authors:  B-x Yan; J-x Ma; J Zhang; Y Guo; M D Mueller; S C Remick; J J Yu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 8.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.